What Happens to Op-Amp Gain When Switch is On?

AI Thread Summary
In a non-inverting Op-Amp circuit, the gain is initially calculated as A = 1 + (R1 + R2)/R3 when the switch is off. When the switch is turned on, it shorts R2, leading to a new gain of A = 1 + (R1)/R3. The discussion highlights the importance of proper circuit diagram conventions, such as using junction points to indicate connections. The circuit's functionality is compromised when the switch is open due to a lack of negative feedback. Overall, understanding the impact of the switch on gain and adhering to schematic conventions is crucial for accurate circuit design.
foobag
Messages
75
Reaction score
0
http://img684.imageshack.us/img684/8362/opamp2.png

Lets say we are given a non-inverting Op-Amp

The gain of this circuit would be A = 1 + (R1+R2)/R3 if the switch is off.

What happens when the switch is turned on? It shorts the R1 and R2 resistors am I correct? Does this mean that R1 and R2 will behave as if they are in parallel, and decrease the overall gain of this amplifier?

Appreciate your help!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
As you have drawn it, only R2 is shorted.

So, the gain is A = 1 + (R1)/R3.
 
ah ok, thank you for your help!
 
As the circuit is drawn it doesn't work (in any sensible way) when the switch is open as there is no negative feedback.

Where two wires cross on a circuit diagram you MUST place a "junction point" (filled in dot) if the two wires are connected at that point. Otherwise there is NO connection. This is the standard convention.
 
Another convention is to draw a hump where there is a crossover that doesn't touch.

Yet another is draw a broken line where it passes under another wire.

All three methods are used but I like the solid circle method as it is unambiguous.

In this case, there is apparently a connection at each side of the resistor with the switch across it.
 
Last edited:
vk6kro said:
Another convention is to draw a hump where there is a crossover that doesn't touch.
Yeah but that is somewhat outdated now. The most common convention (which is used almost universally in circuits and schematic software) is the use of the junction point "dot".

btw UART, where are you in oz? Up very late unless you are in WA?
Yeah I'm just up late.
 
I used to be an HVAC technician. One time I had a service call in which there was no power to the thermostat. The thermostat did not have power because the fuse in the air handler was blown. The fuse in the air handler was blown because there was a low voltage short. The rubber coating on one of the thermostat wires was chewed off by a rodent. The exposed metal in the thermostat wire was touching the metal cabinet of the air handler. This was a low voltage short. This low voltage...
Hey guys. I have a question related to electricity and alternating current. Say an alien fictional society developed electricity, and settled on a standard like 73V AC current at 46 Hz. How would appliances be designed, and what impact would the lower frequency and voltage have on transformers, wiring, TVs, computers, LEDs, motors, and heating, assuming the laws of physics and technology are the same as on Earth?
Thread 'How Does Jaguar's 1980s V12 Dual Coil Ignition System Enhance Spark Strength?'
I have come across a dual coil ignition system as used by Jaguar on their V12 in the 1980's. It uses two ignition coils with their primary windings wired in parallel. The primary coil has its secondary winding wired to the distributor and then to the spark plugs as is standard practice. However, the auxiliary coil has it secondary winding output sealed off. The purpose of the system was to provide a stronger spark to the plugs, always a difficult task with the very short dwell time of a...
Back
Top