What happens to polarised light?

  • Thread starter Thread starter very_curious
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light
AI Thread Summary
Polarised lenses allow only certain light orientations to pass through, while the rest is either absorbed or reflected, depending on the polarisation mechanism. In Polaroid and LCDs, light that doesn't align with the polariser's orientation is absorbed, while in cases like Brewster angle polarisation, it is reflected. The structure of Polaroid film, made from aligned polyvinyl alcohol and iodine, ensures that only light polarised parallel to the chains is absorbed. Electrons in the polariser absorb light based on the orientation of the electric field, functioning as conductors in one direction and non-conductors in another. Understanding these principles is essential for applications in sunglasses, photographic filters, and optical communications.
very_curious
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
I wasn't sure which forum this came under, so...

I've read the basic idea of polarised lenses: light rays have an 'orientation', and when a light beam passes through a polariser only certain orientations get through.

1. But what happens to the rest of the light i.e. those rays that don't get through? Are they absorbed? Re-emitted in a different direction? Why?

Any help would be great,
 
Science news on Phys.org
Depends on the particular mechanism of polarisation.
In the case of 'Polaroid' or LCDs the off-plane light is absorbed.
In the case of Brewster angle polarisation (water, glass) it's simply reflected.

I don't know of any cases where it's actually rotated - it might be possible.
 
Lots here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polarizer

in brief:

"...Polaroid film was in its original form an arrangement of many microscopic herapathite crystals. Its later H-sheet form is rather similar to the wire-grid polarizer. It is made from polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) plastic with an iodine doping. Stretching of the sheet during manufacture ensures that the PVA chains are aligned in one particular direction. Electrons from the iodine dopant are able to travel along the chains, ensuring that light polarized parallel to the chains is absorbed by the sheet; light polarized perpendicularly to the chains is transmitted. The durability and practicality of Polaroid makes it the most common type of polarizer in use, for example for sunglasses, photographic filters, and liquid crystal displays. It is also much cheaper than other types of polarizer.

An important[citation needed] modern type of absorptive polarizer is made of elongated silver nanoparticles embedded in thin (≤0.5 mm) glass plates. These polarizers are more durable, and can polarize light much better than Polaroid film, achieving polarization ratios as high as 100,000:1 and absorption of correctly-polarized light as low as 1.5%.[2] Such glass polarizers perform best for short-wavelength infrared light, and are widely used in optical fiber communications."
 
Okay thanks - that's useful!

So some of the light is absorbed by the electrons in the polariser, which move back and forth along the molecule chains (which are all parallel to each other).

For clarity though - why do the electons only absorb the light which has its electric field perpendicular to the direction of the molecule chains? Is it something to do with the direction of an electric force?
 
I remember my optics professor saying that polarizers were conducting in one orientation and non-conducting in another. Thus the voltage along one axis of the light is zero because of the conductor (IE. the light gets "absorbed" if it's polarized in the particular orientation where the electric field is along the conductor).
 
Thread 'Simple math model for a Particle Image Velocimetry system'
Hello togehter, I am new to this forum and hope this post followed all the guidelines here (I tried to summarized my issue as clean as possible, two pictures are attached). I would appreciate every help: I am doing research on a Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) system. For this I want to set a simple math model for the system. I hope you can help me out. Regarding this I have 2 main Questions. 1. I am trying to find a math model which is describing what is happening in a simple Particle...
I would like to use a pentaprism with some amount of magnification. The pentaprism will be used to reflect a real image at 90 degrees angle but I also want the reflected image to appear larger. The distance between the prism and the real image is about 70cm. The pentaprism has two reflecting sides (surfaces) with mirrored coating and two refracting sides. I understand that one of the four sides needs to be curved (spherical curvature) to achieve the magnification effect. But which of the...
Back
Top