What happens when a battery is connected to an ideal LC circuit?

AI Thread Summary
Connecting a battery to an ideal LC circuit initiates oscillations, where the voltage across the capacitor and the current through the inductor alternate. Initially, the voltage appears across the inductor, causing the capacitor to charge and the current to build up. As the capacitor reaches the step voltage, the inductor current reaches its maximum, leading to an overshoot in capacitor voltage. This energy exchange between the capacitor and inductor results in continuous oscillation at the resonant frequency, with the capacitor voltage oscillating between 0 and 2V. The process highlights the conservation of energy within the circuit, demonstrating that oscillations will persist indefinitely in an ideal scenario.
k_rlc
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi All ,

I was thinking about the time domain unit step response of ideal series LC crcuit. If both cap and inductor are ideal and unchrged initially and I am looking at voltage across capacitor.
Connecting a battery to LC circuit at t=t1 , would the circuit oscillate ?
I am not able to imagine this situation in terms of current and voltages of inductor /capacitor.I would be greatful if someone could intutively expain (without math and analogies) what exactly would happen.
My another question is, in case of underdamped response of RLC . I am again not able to think what causes the ringing behaviour with respect to inductor / capacitor current and voltage.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
If an ideal DC battery gets connected to ideal de-energized LC circuit, transient is an ideal sine current. Sinnce there's no damping, it will oscillate forever with amplitude I=V/√(L/C) and angular frequency ω=1/√(LC). Voltage on the capacitor will oscillate between 0 and 2V. The process is hard to explain without any math becouse this is the result obtained from solving differential equation.
 
A voltage step applied to an LC series pair will initially appear across the inductor. As current starts to build up through the inductor, (because VL = L * di/dt), the voltage across the capacitor will begin to ramp up. The inductor current will reach a maximum when the capacitor voltage reaches the step voltage, where the inductor voltage passes through zero. The capacitor voltage will overshoot and the cycle will reverse and repeat. The LC pair will ring at the resonant frequency, (at which XL + XC = zero), and because the circuit resistance is zero, it will continue ring forever.
 
zoki85 said:
If an ideal DC battery gets connected to ideal de-energized LC circuit, transient is an ideal sine current. Sinnce there's no damping, it will oscillate forever with amplitude I=V/√(L/C) and angular frequency ω=1/√(LC). Voltage on the capacitor will oscillate between 0 and 2V. The process is hard to explain without any math becouse this is the result obtained from solving differential equation.

Baluncore said:
A voltage step applied to an LC series pair will initially appear across the inductor. As current starts to build up through the inductor, (because VL = L * di/dt), the voltage across the capacitor will begin to ramp up. The inductor current will reach a maximum when the capacitor voltage reaches the step voltage, where the inductor voltage passes through zero. The capacitor voltage will overshoot and the cycle will reverse and repeat. The LC pair will ring at the resonant frequency, (at which XL + XC = zero), and because the circuit resistance is zero, it will continue ring forever.

Thanks Zoki85

Thanks Baluncore. I had also thought on the same lines. However , one question that was challenging my thought process was that when capacitor charges to step voltage then there should will not be any current flowing in inductor so there should not be any overshoot. Hence , I was confused . Let me know if you have any explanation.
 
k_rlc said:
I am not able to imagine this situation in terms of current and voltages of inductor /capacitor.I would be greatful if someone could intutively expain (without math and analogies) what exactly would happen.
Why do you insist on tying your hands behind your back?

When voltage appears across the capacitor it stores energy, simply EC = ½ C V2
When current flows through the inductor it stores energy, simply EL = ½ L I2

Conservation of energy requires that when the capacitor voltage is zero, the inductor current must be at a maximum. Likewise, when the inductor current is zero the capacitor voltage must be at a maximum.

Rather than considering a voltage step applied to an LC series pair, consider the parallel connection of an open circuit inductor with a charged capacitor. The energy flows from the capacitor to the inductor until the capacitor reaches zero voltage, when all the energy is stored in the inductor at maximum current. The energy then passes from the inductor to the capacitor until the capacitor voltage is the negative of it's starting voltage, when the inductor current has fallen again zero. At that point half a cycle has occurred. In effect the capacitor voltage has been reversed. It will reverse again to return the initial situation.
 
Thanks a lot baluncore for all the explanations
 
Hey guys. I have a question related to electricity and alternating current. Say an alien fictional society developed electricity, and settled on a standard like 73V AC current at 46 Hz. How would appliances be designed, and what impact would the lower frequency and voltage have on transformers, wiring, TVs, computers, LEDs, motors, and heating, assuming the laws of physics and technology are the same as on Earth?
While I was rolling out a shielded cable, a though came to my mind - what happens to the current flow in the cable if there came a short between the wire and the shield in both ends of the cable? For simplicity, lets assume a 1-wire copper wire wrapped in an aluminum shield. The wire and the shield has the same cross section area. There are insulating material between them, and in both ends there is a short between them. My first thought, the total resistance of the cable would be reduced...
I used to be an HVAC technician. One time I had a service call in which there was no power to the thermostat. The thermostat did not have power because the fuse in the air handler was blown. The fuse in the air handler was blown because there was a low voltage short. The rubber coating on one of the thermostat wires was chewed off by a rodent. The exposed metal in the thermostat wire was touching the metal cabinet of the air handler. This was a low voltage short. This low voltage...
Back
Top