What happens when two black holes meet?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ASKDodge
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Black holes Holes
AI Thread Summary
When two black holes meet, they merge to form a larger black hole, with the resulting mass being slightly less than the sum of the original masses due to energy loss during the process. If two black holes of equal mass were positioned equidistant from a stationary object, any slight movement of the object would disrupt equilibrium, causing it to be pulled toward the closer black hole. The gravitational fields of black holes extend infinitely, but their influence diminishes rapidly with distance, following the inverse square law. Thus, the combined gravitational effects of nearby objects are crucial in determining the dynamics of such a system. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding gravitational interactions in astrophysics.
ASKDodge
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Although I have a basic knowledge of black holes and the effect they have on matter, I have a question as to what happens when two black holes meet?
Also, what would happen if two black holes of equal mass were equal distance from a stationary object in space, would the object be held in equlibrium by the two equal forces?

P.S. sorry if there are severe flaws with my theory but I have a rather limited knowledge of physics
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
When two black holes meet they combine to form a bigger black hole.

Your second question involves a very unstable situation. Any tiny movement of the object in the middle would lead to it going in the direction of the closer black hole. Also, in your picture, what keeps the black holes from pulling together into one big one, swallowing up the object in the middle?
 
Ah, I see. I was assuming that the two black holes were at equal distance to the object and were outside of each other's gravitational field. I thought that if the conditions were perfect the object could be held in perfect equilibrium.
Also, what is the general size of a black hole's gravitational field and how close would it need to to have an effect on, for example, the movement of planets orbitting a star?

P.S. I understand that it is unlikely any two black holes would be the same size and mass but this all just "theoretical"
 
mathman said:
When two black holes meet they combine to form a bigger black hole.

Just adding a footnote that the mass of the new, bigger black hole is just slightly less than the sum of the two original black holes (some energy...and therefore mass...is lost during the merging).
 
ASKDodge said:
Ah, I see. I was assuming that the two black holes were at equal distance to the object

The thing is, the 3 objects would not be stationary with respect to each other (some kind of orbit involved)...plus, the gravity from other objects in the area would nudge/disrupt any precise equilibrium as mathman noted.

and were outside of each other's gravitational field...Also, what is the general size of a black hole's gravitational field and how close would it need to to have an effect on, for example, the movement of planets orbitting a star?

As modeled by Einstein's General Relativity, gravity fields extend to infinity. So, the net effect is determined from the combined influences of many nearby objects. The strength of the gravity field declines quickly with distance (inverse square law) so the closest/most massive objects have the most influence (and the influence of extremely distant...or low mass...objects can often be negligible to the system).

P.S. I understand that it is unlikely any two black holes would be the same size and mass but this all just "theoretical"

Be careful throwing around the word "theory"/"theoretical". In science, a "theory" has a specific meaning (it's an explanation that already has a good amount of supporting evidence...it's not a guess or a hunch as might be suggested by the everyday/non-scientific use of the word).
 
Is a homemade radio telescope realistic? There seems to be a confluence of multiple technologies that makes the situation better than when I was a wee lad: software-defined radio (SDR), the easy availability of satellite dishes, surveillance drives, and fast CPUs. Let's take a step back - it is trivial to see the sun in radio. An old analog TV, a set of "rabbit ears" antenna, and you're good to go. Point the antenna at the sun (i.e. the ears are perpendicular to it) and there is...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
How does light maintain enough energy in the visible part of the spectrum for the naked eye to see in the night sky. Also, how did it start of in the visible frequency part of the spectrum. Was it, for example, photons being ejected at that frequency after high energy particle interaction. Or does the light become visible (spectrum) after hitting our atmosphere or space dust or something? EDIT: Actually I just thought. Maybe the EM starts off as very high energy (outside the visible...

Similar threads

Back
Top