What Happens When You Pitch a Baseball at 90% the Speed of Light?

  • Thread starter Thread starter vhbelvadi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Baseball
AI Thread Summary
When a baseball is pitched at 90% the speed of light, it would disintegrate upon colliding with air particles, releasing immense energy due to relativistic effects. The discussion highlights the necessity of vacuum conditions in particle accelerators to prevent destructive collisions with air. At such high speeds, the kinetic energy of the baseball approaches its rest mass energy, leading to a significant energy release upon impact. The energy output from this collision would be calculated using E=mc^2, indicating a massive explosion. Overall, the scenario illustrates the extreme consequences of relativistic speeds on matter.
vhbelvadi
Messages
67
Reaction score
1
I came across this from xkcd today. The question seems interesting, but I was wondering if this expplanation quite covers this or are there other possibilities? (Also, is something wrong with this explanation?)

Basically they're dealing with a baseball pitched at relativistic speeds.

http://what-if.xkcd.com/1/
 
Physics news on Phys.org
haha, yeah, something like that would probably happen. The ball would definitely get destroyed. Particle accelerators must be vacuum for this reason - if there was air in there, then the particles would collide with them. So if there was a ball going at this speed, then all the particles in the ball would collide with the air particles, giving off ridiculous amounts of energy.
 
@BruceW - An open air particle accelerator--my thoughts exactly!
So, basically, it's 150g of particles colliding with air molecules, so wouldn't the collision (for now let's assume there's no batter for a good distance) cause the entire ball to disintegrate resulting in the generation of energy we can't quite handle?
Or will it be within comparatively safe limits?
 
at 0.9c, the kinetic energy is at a similar level to the rest mass energy. And from what you know about E=mc^2, this is going to be a huge amount of energy since we have a tenth of a kilogram of mass to play with.

Edit: So, specifically, the energy output of the explosion will be of the order of c^2 times by 1/10 kilogram
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top