What Insights Can We Gain from M87's Jet Observations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter RJ Emery
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Jet
AI Thread Summary
M87's jet has been observed to exhibit superluminal speeds, attributed to visual effects rather than actual faster-than-light travel, with measurements derived from VLBI radio astronomy tracking the movement of bright spots in the jet. There is speculation about the existence of an opposite jet, although concrete evidence is not readily available. If M87's jet were oriented directly towards Earth, it could produce significant emissions across the electromagnetic spectrum, potentially even being visible to the naked eye. Observations of the jet pointed away from us provide a different data set compared to a head-on view, which would likely yield more spectacular results. Understanding these dynamics enhances our knowledge of relativistic jets and their implications in astrophysics.
RJ Emery
Messages
114
Reaction score
6
I have several questions concerning M87's jet:

1. From observations by the HST of the jet, its speed was determined to be several times faster than that of light. The superluminal effect has been attributed to visual effects, a conclusion I do not dispute. However, I do not understand how the measurement was made and what visual effects would give rise to a FTL result. Anyone have any insights?

2. Has there been an opposite jet detected?

3. If M87's jet were pointed directly towards us, what would we likely see (across the spectrum from gamma to radio)?

4. We have some measurements and knowledge of the galaxy with its jet pointed away from us. How might that data set be different with a head on view?
 
Space news on Phys.org
RJ Emery said:
I have several questions concerning M87's jet:

1. From observations by the HST of the jet, its speed was determined to be several times faster than that of light. The superluminal effect has been attributed to visual effects, a conclusion I do not dispute. However, I do not understand how the measurement was made and what visual effects would give rise to a FTL result. Anyone have any insights?
IIRC, the measurement was not made by the HST, but by one or more VLBI radio astronomy observations. 'Bright spots' (aka 'knots') in the jet were observed to have different positions on the sky, at different times. Geometry, plus a distance to M87, gives the apparent speed of these knots.

I don't recall the particular mechanism used to explain the supraluminal speed, for the M87 jet, but it's an illusion, much like the apparent speed of a lighthouse beam on a (very) distant screen, or the point where a giant pair of scissors closes - you have to separate what's actually moving from what seems to be moving.
2. Has there been an opposite jet detected?
IIRC, yes. However, a quick search failed to find any relevant papers, so I may be mis-remembering (or simply didn't search long enough).
3. If M87's jet were pointed directly towards us, what would we likely see (across the spectrum from gamma to radio)?
Pretty much the same as a http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blazar" . I don't know how bright it would be - could even be unaided eye visible! - but it would certainly be spectacular. One thing that would be exciting would be the TeV gammas and UHECRs that we'd likely see coming from it.
4. We have some measurements and knowledge of the galaxy with its jet pointed away from us. How might that data set be different with a head on view?
As above.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
what is the current status of the field for quantum cosmology, are there any observations that support any theory of quantum cosmology? is it just cosmology during the Planck era or does it extend past the Planck era. what are the leading candidates into research into quantum cosmology and which physics departments research it? how much respect does loop quantum cosmology has compared to string cosmology with actual cosmologists?
Back
Top