I What Insights on Time in Physics and Cosmology Emerged from the Pi Conference?

AI Thread Summary
The Pi Conference on time featured prominent cosmologists like Sean Carroll and Lee Smolin, discussing various theories including Loop Quantum Cosmology (LQC). There was notable debate over whether LQC should be classified as a cyclic model, with some arguing that it only predicts a single bounce rather than an infinite cycle. Questions arose about the compartmentalization in scientific understanding, particularly regarding expert opinions on LQC's classification. The conference highlighted the complexity of defining models in cosmology and the need for clarity in terminology. Overall, the discussions underscored ongoing debates in the field about the nature of time and the universe's evolution.
windy miller
Messages
306
Reaction score
28
The Pi just posted a bunch of videos from their conference on time
http://pirsa.org
A lot of the big names in cosmology were there: Sean Carroll, Lee Smolin, Abhay Ashtekar , Andy Albrecht, George Ellis etc
I have to say though I'm a little surprised at some of the questions. How is it i ( layman in this field ) knows that LQC isn't a cyclic model but Andy Albrecht one of the world experts ,doesn't? It makes me think there is far too much compartmentalisation in science, but maybe that's inevitable . Anyway this conference seemed to bring people together form different research programmes and is very interesting if you have the time.
 
Space news on Phys.org
Why do you think LQC isn't a cyclic model?
 
As I understand it , it gives corrections to the Gr at high curvature, replacing the big bang singularity with a bounce. it doesn't make predictions about dark energy turning around and causing a recollapse and hence it is not a cyclic model.
 
windy miller said:
As I understand it , it gives corrections to the Gr at high curvature, replacing the big bang singularity with a bounce. it doesn't make predictions about dark energy turning around and causing a recollapse and hence it is not a cyclic model.
https://arxiv.org/abs/1507.00226
https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0407115

I believe a universe with a bounce is frequently called "cyclic" even if there isn't an infinite chain of cycles.
 
  • Like
Likes Fervent Freyja
I have no idea how it can possibly be appropriate to call a universe that contracts and then expands but never repeats this process a cyclic one. One that repeats the process sure, but one that doesn't? i don't see how that makes sense.
 
what is the current status of the field for quantum cosmology, are there any observations that support any theory of quantum cosmology? is it just cosmology during the Planck era or does it extend past the Planck era. what are the leading candidates into research into quantum cosmology and which physics departments research it? how much respect does loop quantum cosmology has compared to string cosmology with actual cosmologists?
Back
Top