What is Linear Frame Dragging in General Relativity?

tiny-tim
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
25,837
Reaction score
258
"Linear frame dragging"?

wikipedia at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frame_Dragging#Frame_dragging_effects says:
Linear frame dragging is the similarly inevitable result of the general principle of relativity, applied to linear momentum. Although it arguably has equal theoretical legitimacy to the "rotational" effect, the difficulty of obtaining an experimental verification of the effect means that it receives much less discussion and is often omitted from articles on frame-dragging (but see Einstein, 1921)

(Naty1 has drawn attention to this to this in a Library comment.)

What is this referring to?

Is it a generally accepted terminology, or is it just wikipedia's wishful thinking? :confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Linear frame-dragging is the effect that if a test mass is near to an accelerating massive object, its frame of reference is slightly accelerated in the same direction, giving the impression that the rest of the universe is accelerating slightly in the opposite direction. This is consistent with the Mach's principle idea that if the whole universe were accelerating uniformly in the same direction, local reference frames would also accelerate with it, making the acceleration unobservable.

This linear frame-dragging effect is of course tiny in comparison with the ordinary gravitational acceleration and is even more difficult to measure than rotational frame-dragging.

I don't know where the terminology came from; I've heard it before, but I've also heard this effect being referred to as "inertia induction" (by Dennis Sciama, in his fascinating paper "On the Origin of Inertia").
 


If anyone knows a physical explanation for frame dragging, I'd sure be interested. Wiki derives the ffect from the Kerr metric: does the interaction arise from a specific piece of the Einstein stress energy tensor??

Also, how is frame dragging related to the geodetic effect; Wikipedia has a cross reference with frame dragging, but the relationship isn't clear..

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geodetic_effect
 


When I read a few pages about rotational frame dragging in Fabric of The Cosmos by Brian Greene, I see I wrote myself a note:

"seems to follow the equivalence principle of acceleration and "g", but here via
v = w(r)" ...not too far fetched...

Brian Greene says :
...just as a massive objects warps space and time so a rotating object drags space and time around it...(it) implies, for example, an asteroid freely falling toward a rapdily rotating neutron star or black hole will get caught up in a whirlpool of spinning space and be whipped around as it journeys downward."
 
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
The Poynting vector is a definition, that is supposed to represent the energy flow at each point. Unfortunately, the only observable effect caused by the Poynting vector is through the energy variation in a volume subject to an energy flux through its surface, that is, the Poynting theorem. As a curl could be added to the Poynting vector without changing the Poynting theorem, it can not be decided by EM only that this should be the actual flow of energy at each point. Feynman, commenting...
Back
Top