What is new with Koide sum rules?

  • Thread starter arivero
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Rules Sum
In summary: } )^2+\left( 3 (1- {\sqrt...} )^2\right)+\left( 3 (1+ {\sqrt...} )^2\right)\right)n=\left( 1 (1+ {\sqrt...} )^2+\left( 1 (1- {\sqrt...} )^2\right)+\left( 1 (1+ {\sqrt...} )^2\right)\right)gives the following result:m_g=\left( 3+\sqrt 3 \over 2+\left( 3-\sqrt 3 \over 2\right)+\left( 3+\sq
  • #281
I think that the drawing is at least the second version from De Rujula, but the only one he found in his archive as it is used in some publication. I saw another version during a talk in my hometown, I was in the first course of the undergraduate physics studies, and someone did a series of talks addressed to secondary school teachers. Around 1985-1986 then.

Yes, all the masses are in MeV. What we are doing here is just apply the mass formula [itex]M(a,b)= k (z_a+z_b)^2[/itex]. When one of the charges is constant, say z_q, and the other three sum zero [itex]z_1+z_2+z_3=0[/itex], then we have [itex]k(z_q+ z_i)^2[/itex] is a koide formula if and only if [itex]3 z_q^2 = z_1^2+z^2+ z^3[/itex]. The zero sum rule is the tradicional cosine of the most common version here in the thread. I have used alpha instead of delta for the phase because I am doing more jumps than usual. Koide phase is not only periodic 2 pi /3; it also allows reflections on pi/4 and pi/2. So I am not using the usual phase for the leptons but a reflected one.

Besides checking that I am recovering the usual koide formula, I was interested on the singular points and what kind of particles I get. I went with MeV masses because I was tired of exact roots of two, roots of three etc.

The particles (or pairs of preons) are organised according representations of SU(3)xSU(2). When the SU(2) is a singlet, it means the two particles are from the SU(3), ie they are pairs from the ones I call d,s,b. When the SU(2) is a doublet, one of the particles is a "c" or a "u". For these particles, the charge "z_c" does not come from the cosine but from the rule of the average of squares. I mean, the are the "z_0" of usual koide formula.

In the case pi/4 the charge of "s" coincides also with z_0, so what happens is that we get a massless lepton and that the s particle can also act to produce a pretty exotic koide tuple in the quark sector ds,ss,bs

(More properly, the "antiquark" sector, as a pair such as ds is an antiquark)

I am impressed by the "sneutrino" sector, as I had not anticipated the obvious thing that half of the
scalar neutrinos are massless, independently of the koide phase.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes ohwilleke
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #282
Mitchel asked me if I can tell something about the preons in each tuple. I do not see any connection beyond the factor three we knew, and the coincidence with the current quark mass, 313MeV.

What we have, with all the masses in GeV and all current values from pdg, is

mt=(√29.67+√59.13)^2
mb=(√29.67-√11.57)^2 =(√0.925+√1.174)^2
mc=(√29.67-√18.65)^2 =(√0.925+√0.028)^2
ms =(√0.925-√1.61)^2

tau=(√0.3139+√0.5972)^2
mu=(√0.3139-√0.05531)^2
e=(√0.3139-√0.289)^2

EDIT: on inspection, there are some near integer multiples:
2 * 29.67 -> 59.13 <- 99*0.5972
2* 0.0277379 = 0.0554759 -> 0.0553085
2* 0.5972 -> 1.174
2* 0.289 -> 0.5972
4* 0.289 -> 1.174
other worse
33*0.028 -> 0.925
40*0.289 -> 11.57
...
and including the original quarks and leptons:
7 * 0.5972 -> mb
3 * 0.5972 -> tau
mt/ms -> mproton/me -> 0.925/me
4*0.3139 -> mc
3*ms -> 0.289

Not sure how relevant; or perhaps I should also check with mc_predicted, ms_predicted instead of measured. Note that the tau, mu, e is precise enough to discard exactitude of all of these two factors. They look just as QCD-like quantities: 289 MeV, 55 MeV, 597 MeV, 313 MeV (the average of all the other three, as required by Koide)...
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes ohwilleke

Similar threads

  • Poll
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
62
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
19
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top