What is scattering by a potential and how does it affect a passing particle?

Shaybay92
Messages
122
Reaction score
0
"Scattering" by a potential

When we have an unbound particle traveling past a potential well, what does it mean when it is said that the potential well will "scatter" the particle?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


In the one-dimensional case, it means that there is some probability that the particle will be reflected instead of transmitted.

In the two- or three-dimensional case, it means that there is some probability that the particle will emerge in a different direction than it entered.
 


What do you mean when you say transmitted/reflected? If we are talking about a beam of electrons moving towards an attractive square potential (-ve well), what is meant by whether it is transmitted or not..? (In 1D)
 


Suppose the particle is coming in from the -x direction, that is, it is traveling in the +x direction. Then:

Transmitted = after interacting with the barrier, it is traveling in the +x direction.

Reflected = after interacting with the barrier, it is traveling in the -x direction.
 


Ok, but how physically does this make sense? How does the fact it goes past a potential change its path? I suppose I still don't fully understand what potential wells represent physically.
 


In classical mechanics a proton, say, produces an electric field, and a passing electron can be deflected ("scattered") by this electric field. You can also write the problem in terms of the electron moving in an electric potential set up by the proton. This is how you have to do the problem in quantum mechanics.
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top