What is the Angular Acceleration for a Rotating Computer Disk Drive?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the angular acceleration of a computer disk drive that starts from rest and has a constant angular acceleration. It is established that the drive takes 0.690 seconds to complete its second revolution, and the goal is to determine the time taken for the first revolution and the angular acceleration. Various equations of motion for rotational dynamics are applied, leading to the formulation of a quadratic equation to relate the times of the two revolutions. The participants clarify the correct application of angular displacement and acceleration formulas, ultimately deriving the necessary values. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurately solving for both angular acceleration and the time for the first revolution.
PirateFan308
Messages
91
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A computer disk drive is turned on starting from rest and has constant angular acceleration.
If it took 0.690s for the drive to make its second complete revolution, how long did it take to make the first complete revolution?
What is the angular acceleration?

Homework Equations


w2 = w02+2\alpha∅

∅=w0t+(0.5)\alphat2

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm trying to first find the angular acceleration, and from there I can find out how long it took to make the first complete revolution.

First revolution:
w0=0 t=? \alpha=\alpha w=w ∅=2∏

Second revolution:
w0=w t=0.690s \alpha=\alpha ∅=2∏

Second revolution:

∅=w0t+(0.5)\alphat2
2∏ = w0(0.690)+(0.5)\alpha(0.690)2
\alpha=\frac{2∏-w0(0.69)}{(0.5)(0.69)^2}

First equation:
w2=w02+2\alpha(2∏)
(\frac{2∏-w0(0.69)}{(0.5)(0.69)^2})(\frac{2∏-w0(0.69)}{(0.5)(0.69)^2})=2\alpha(2∏)
I rearranged to get:
4∏2=\alpha((4∏(0.69)2)+(π(0.69)2)-((0.5)(0.69)2))
\alpha=5.45
 
Physics news on Phys.org
PirateFan308 said:
First revolution:
w0=0 t=? \alpha=\alpha w=w ∅=2∏

Second revolution:
w0=w t=0.690s \alpha=\alpha ∅=2∏

Second revolution:

∅=w0t+(0.5)\alphat2
2∏ = w0(0.690)+(0.5)\alpha(0.690)2
\alpha=\frac{2∏-w0(0.69)}{(0.5)(0.69)^2}

I agree up to this point.

First equation:
w2=w02+2\alpha(2∏)
(\frac{2∏-w0(0.69)}{(0.5)(0.69)^2})(\frac{2∏-w0(0.69)}{(0.5)(0.69)^2})=2\alpha(2∏)
I rearranged to get:
4∏2=\alpha((4∏(0.69)2)+(π(0.69)2)-((0.5)(0.69)2))
\alpha=5.45

Your "velocity-squared" equation is all right, and \omega_{0} = 0 . But doesn't that then lead to

\omega^{2} = 0^{2} + 4 \alpha \pi \Rightarrow \omega^{2} = 4 \pi \cdot \frac{2 \pi - \omega (0.69)}{(0.5)(0.69)^2} ,

with \omega being the angular speed at the start of the second revolution? (In fact, your expression in parentheses has units of rad/(sec2), so you can't mean to insert it into the first equation for \omega .)

(And I don't see a much tidier way of doing this, in view of the information given and the fact that there are two unknowns.)

BTW, don't forget to answer the first question about how long the first revolution took.
 
Last edited:
I figured out a couple of different ways to solve this. They both lead me to the same quadratic equation for t2/t1, where t1 is the time required for the first revolution, and t2 is the time required for the second revolution (which we know to be 0.69 s).

Method 1:

Angular displacement between t = 0 and t = t1:

\Delta \theta = \frac{1}{2}\alpha (\Delta t)^2 \Rightarrow 2 \pi = \frac{1}{2}\alpha t_1^2

\Rightarrow \alpha = \frac{4\pi}{t_1^2}

Angular displacement between t = 0 and t = t2:

4 \pi = \frac{1}{2}\alpha (t_1+t_2)^2

8 \pi = \frac{4\pi}{t_1^2} (t_1+t_2)^2

2 = \frac{t_1^2 + 2t_1t_2 + t_2^2}{t_1^2}

2 = 1 + 2\frac{t_2}{t_1} + \left(\frac{t_2}{t_1}\right)^2

Letting x = t2/t1, this becomes the quadratic equation:

x^2 + 2x - 1 = 0

which you can solve.

Method 2:

Angular displacement between t = 0 and t = t1:

\Delta \theta = \frac{1}{2}\alpha (\Delta t)^2 \Rightarrow 2 \pi = \frac{1}{2}\alpha t_1^2

\Rightarrow \alpha = \frac{4\pi}{t_1^2}

Angular displacement between t = t1 and t = t2:

2\pi = \omega_1 t_2 + \frac{1}{2}\alpha t_2^2

But \omega_1 (the speed at the end of the first revolution) is just \alpha t_1. Also, if you substitute in the expression for alpha, you get:

2\pi = 4\pi \frac{t_2}{t_1} + 2\pi \frac{t_2^2}{t_1^2}

1 = 2x + x^2

Same quadratic as before. Since you know t2 (it's given), once you solve for x, you have solved for t1. Discard the solution to the quadratic in which the ratio is negative.
 
Wow, thanks guys! That helped a lot!
 
One question, how did you format your equations so that they looked so much neater and easier to read?
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
Back
Top