What Is the Average Force of Impact on a Ball Struck by a Bat?

  • Thread starter Thread starter fizziksr0cks
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Linear
AI Thread Summary
The average force of impact on a ball struck by a bat, given a mass of 0.2 kg and an initial speed of 26 m/s, is calculated to be 5200 N using the impulse-momentum principle. However, the calculation appears to be consistently off by half, indicating a potential error in the application of the formula. For a force of 20000 N, the resulting speed after the collision is determined to be -74 m/s, indicating the ball moves in the opposite direction. The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly applying kinematic equations and Newton's second law in solving these problems. This analysis provides valuable insights for those grappling with similar physics questions.
fizziksr0cks
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A ball with a mass of .2 kg traveling at a speed of 26 m/s is struck by a bat. If the duration of the impulse is .001 seconds and the speed of the ball afterwards is the same as before, what is the average force (to the nearest Newton) of the impact? On the other hand, if the magnitude of the average force is 20000 N, what is the speed to the nearest m/s after collision?

Homework Equations



Fnett =\Deltap = m\Deltav

The Attempt at a Solution



F=(.2 kg)(26m/s-0)/.001 = 5200

This answer is always 1/2 off the correct answer so I'm not sure if the equation I'm using is wrong or if I'm applying it incorrectly. As for the second question, I'm not quite sure where to go with it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Haha I got the answer. It goes back to thinking Kinematics equations where vf=vi+at

therefore, to get the acceleration you use Newton's second law: F=ma where F= 20000N and m = .2 to get a = 100,000

vf = vi + at
vf= 26 - (100,000)(.001)
vf = -74 m/s
vf is 74 m/s in the opposite direction it was thrown in

hope this helps someone else that's stuck
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top