MHB What is the best book on category theory for beginners?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on recommendations for beginner-friendly books on category theory. Key suggestions include "Conceptual Mathematics" by Lawvere and Schanuel for its accessibility and foundational concepts, and "Topoi: The Categorial Analysis of Logic" by Goldblatt, which is available online. Other notable mentions are "Category Theory" by Steve Awodey and "Basic Category Theory for Computer Scientists" by Benjamin Pierce, both respected in the field. Participants also suggest exploring math.stackexchange.com for additional resources and recommendations tailored to specific interests. Overall, these resources aim to make category theory more approachable for newcomers.
alyafey22
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
1,556
Reaction score
2
Hey guys , what is the best book to read about category theory ?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Ah, you want to learn abstract nonsense! Good for you! Category theory (CT) is extensively used in computer science (for example, in the theory of programming languages). Moreover, even among practicing researches it has the reputation of a somewhat esoteric discipline. Some people are comfortable with it, but not everybody, and a lot of options are open only to the former.

The most elementary book is probably Conceptual Mathematics by Lawvere and Schanuel. It is of the kind that can be read not necessarily at a desk with a pen in hand, but it does teach you the right concepts, up to the ones that we covered only at the end of a graduate-level semester course. Also, Lawvere is one of the pillars in CT. I want to re-read this book. Another accessible (though oldish) book is Topoi: The Categorial Analysis of Logic by Goldblatt. It is available online.

I was recommended Category Theory by Steve Awodey. They say that he also has lecture notes online. There is also Basic Category Theory for Computer Scientists by Benjamin Pierce. I have not seen it, but I respect the author and read another of his books. The book used in the course that I took was Category Theory: An Introduction by Herrlich and Strecker. It's not bad, but uses a lot of examples from math (rings, topological spaces, etc.). The authors also have the book Abstract and Concrete Categories available online.

I recommend searching at math.stackexchange.com. There are several similar questions there and some good recommendations, including books for programmers, connections with other subjects, such as analysis, links to lecture notes, videos and so on.
 
Oh man , you are awesome . I was recommended to read the book by Pierce by a prefessor in the Math department but haven't started reading it yet . I will look at the book by F. William Lawvere , it seems good .
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top