What is the change of variables for Lennard-Jones potential?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the change of variables in the Lennard-Jones potential formula. A participant suggests defining a new unitless variable, X = r/σ, to simplify the equation. However, another user expresses difficulty in arriving at the proof using this substitution and requests further clarification. The response emphasizes that the substitution is merely a change of variables and questions the meaning of 'X' in the context. The conversation highlights the need for a deeper understanding of the implications of the variable change in the Lennard-Jones potential.
Lavace
Messages
62
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


[PLAIN]http://img94.imageshack.us/img94/4287/len2.jpg

Homework Equations


[PLAIN]http://img710.imageshack.us/img710/2428/len1y.jpg


The Attempt at a Solution


I know my way around the Lennard-Jones potential formula, but this question stumps me.

Any clues on how to proceed are greatly thanked!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Just define a new unitless variable as X=r/\sigma.
 
nickjer said:
Just define a new unitless variable as X=r/\sigma.


I used your defined variable and plugged it in, but still cannot arrive at the proof given in the question, could you possibly expand further?

Thank you!
 
I wouldn't call that a proof. You are just doing a change of variables. You can replace r/\sigma with X in the above equation. Unless 'X' has a meaning that I am unaware of.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top