What Is the Commutator [Le, Lf] in Terms of e, f, and L?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the commutator [Le, Lf] in terms of unit vectors e, f, and angular momentum operator L. The initial attempt suggests that the result may be zero, but there is uncertainty about this conclusion. Participants recommend expressing the unit vectors in Cartesian coordinates to utilize known commutation relations for angular momentum. A suggestion is made to start with simple cases, such as setting e and f as the x and y unit vectors, respectively. The conversation emphasizes the importance of showing detailed workings to clarify the reasoning behind the result.
Monalisa
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let e and f be unit vectors. Le = eL is the definition of the component of angular momentum in direction e. Calculate the commutator [Le,Lf ] in terms of e, f and L

Homework Equations


[A,B]=(AB-BA)

The Attempt at a Solution



we know that L=r x p, in classical mechanics, and in quantum physics we have the operators for angular momentum in cartesian coordinates for example, but in my problem I have just two direction, e and f, and I am obtaining as answering 0. How can I do this exercise ? thanks
upload_2015-2-4_23-34-19.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Since you know the commutation relations for the Cartesian components of L, it might be a good idea to write out e##\cdot##L and f##\cdot##L in terms of the Cartesian components of L.
 
Are the unit vectors ##\hat{e}## and ##\hat{f}## some arbitrary unit vectors in Cartesian space? In that case, it might be easy to start with something simple such as ##\hat{e} = \hat{x}## and ##\hat{f} = \hat{y}## and then moving into a more general case.
 
but, and about the z component for example, if I do this in two coordenates, the answer will be zero, maybe is zero the solution, I do not know
 
Why zero ? Follow Sigurdsson's sound advice and post your workings, please.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top