What is the Concept of a Fractional Dimension Probability Sphere?

bchui
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
I have heard of such idea:

A sphere of fractional dimension 0<s<1 is understood as a probability sphere with probability s to have an electron at a certain position

for example the volume of the sphere S^{n-1} in \Re^n has volume

Vol(S^{n-1})= (2\Pi^{n/2})/(\Gamma(n/2)

and we can apply the result to non-integer values of n

Anyone have heard of this idea and show me the link for further information? :confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have been searching for the same thing, and a few places say that it is given by:

\Gamma^2(1/2)/\Gamma(n/2)

for any dimension, even fractional ones, but I am trying to find a way to prove it myself, perhaps using integration with respect to the Hausdorff measure (since it recognizes non-integer dimensions). And just a note- the formula you gave is actually the area measure of the unit S^{n-1} sphere, the volume of the unit S^{n-1} sphere is actually:

Vol(S^{n-1})=[2\pi^{(n-1)/2}]/[\Gamma((n-1)/2+1)],

**Note that the denominator can be rewritten {(n-1)/2}\Gamma((n-1)/2)}.
 
The proof for integer n is simple and done by induction. It could be found for example in

Chapter 5.9 of W Fleming: "Functions of Several Variables", Springer-
Verlag 1977

We generalize n! to \Gamma(n+1) and the formula is obtained.
My problem is the physical aspect. What is the physical mean of a "fractional sphere" and could it possibly be related to "probability sphere" in Quantum Mechanics?
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top