What is the configuration of 3 blocks connected by a line and its balance?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mojki1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Blocks Line
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the balance of three blocks connected by a line, with a friction coefficient (µ) and an angle (α) of 30 degrees. Participants clarify that the blocks are stationary, and the goal is to find the limits of the masses that allow the system to remain in balance. The correct approach involves equating forces, leading to the equation mgsin(30°) + µmgcos(30°) + µmg = 2mg, while noting that µ is given and fixed. There is confusion about whether the problem requires limits for µ or for the masses, with the consensus leaning towards focusing on the masses. The conversation highlights the need for clarity in the problem statement to resolve ambiguities regarding the variables involved.
mojki1
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Last time I have had problem with one task:
http://img543.imageshack.us/i/cosc.jpg/
They questioned us to determine compartments in with that configuration will be on balance.
Informations:
u-Friction
alpha=30

Homework Equations



If that configuration must be on balance so acceleration must be 0. So we can compare forces working on that blocks.
-Qx1-T1-T2=Q3

The Attempt at a Solution



If we compare forces which working on that configuration we will go to moment that masses of that blocks will be reduced.
-mgsin(30)- umgcos(30)-umg=2mg
But this is not a solution of that task.
Sorry for my language. Thx for help:smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi mojki1! :smile:

(have an alpha: α and a mu: µ and a degree: ° :wink:)

what exactly is the question?

are the blocks stationary, or are they moving with zero acceleration?

i'm guessing that you mean that the blocks are stationary, and that the question wants you to give the limits (not "compartments" … that doesn't mean anything in physics :wink:) (on µ) within which that is possible

if so, your answer should have "µ" on one side on its own (and perhaps should have a ≤ or ≥ rather than an =) :wink:
mojki1 said:
If that configuration must be on balance so acceleration must be 0. So we can compare forces working on that blocks.
-Qx1-T1-T2=Q3

If we compare forces which working on that configuration we will go to moment that masses of that blocks will be reduced.
-mgsin(30)- umgcos(30)-umg=2mg
But this is not a solution of that task.

your final equation looks correct to me (except that the minuses should be pluses, and you need to cancel the mgs and make it an equation for µ)

btw, "If we compare forces which working on that configuration we will go to moment that masses of that blocks will be reduced" …

i think you mean something like "If we equate the forces on that configuration (or system) at the instant that the blocks are about to move" :smile:
 
You 're right tiny-tim. The blocks are stationary and question is about the limit of the masses of that blocks for which the system remains in balance. µ is given.
Final equation should looks:

mgsin(30°)+ µmgcos(30°)+µmg=2mg

But this isn't standard task that we have to designate limits for µ, we need designate limits for masses not for µ. µ is given. If i compare that equation, masses will be reduced, so i think that we have to look for this problem from another perspective
 
hi mojki1! :smile:
mojki1 said:
mgsin(30°)+ µmgcos(30°)+µmg=2mg

But this isn't standard task that we have to designate limits for µ, we need designate limits for masses not for µ. µ is given. If i compare that equation, masses will be reduced, so i think that we have to look for this problem from another perspective

if µ is fixed (what is it, btw?), and if the ratio of the masses (m:m:2m) is also fixed, then the value of m makes no difference :confused:

there must be something missing from the question :redface:
 
µ is constant for all blocks, only masses are your variables

EDIT:
data for this task were symbols
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Back
Top