What Is the Connection Between Black Hole Entropy and the Holographic Principle?

AI Thread Summary
Hawking's computation of black hole entropy, which is determined to be 1/4 of the Planck area, is distinct from the holographic principle, which posits that information is encoded on the surface area of a black hole rather than its volume. There is currently no observational evidence for Hawking radiation, although related effects have been observed in other systems, such as sound waves in fluids. The entropy calculation remains valid regardless of the holographic principle's truth. The discussion highlights a historical perspective on why Hawking did not initially connect his findings to the broader implications of information storage in physical systems. Overall, the relationship between black hole entropy and the holographic principle continues to be a topic of exploration and debate in theoretical physics.
Edward Wij
Messages
130
Reaction score
0
How exactly did Hawking compute that black hole entropy is 1/4 that of a Planck area and concluded about the holographic principle where information of a volume is located on the area of black hole? And if there was no holographic principle, how big should entropy of the black hole be with reference to Planck area (would it be say 1/8 or twice that of Planck area for example)? How is this computed?

What observational evidence is there for these? Do all observations still obey the holographic principle?
 
Space news on Phys.org
Edward Wij said:
How exactly
Black Holes and Entropy
Bekenstein, Phys. Rev. D 7, 2333, abstract

Black hole explosions?
Hawking, Nature 248, 30 - 31 (01 March 1974), abstract

There is no observational evidence for hawking radiation from black holes at all - but that is not unexpected as the radiation is so weak. There are some experiments that see similar effects in other types of effective horizons (water waves, I think currents, and whatever).
 
Edward Wij said:
the holographic principle where information of a volume is located on the area of black hole?

Hawking didn't come up with this principle, and it is a separate concept from the computation of entropy in terms of the horizon area. See here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holographic_principle

Edward Wij said:
if there was no holographic principle, how big should entropy of the black hole be with reference to Planck area (would it be say 1/8 or twice that of Planck area for example)?

The computation of the black hole entropy, as above, does not depend on the holographic principle; it is the same whether that principle is true or false.
 
mfb said:
There is no observational evidence for hawking radiation from black holes at all - but that is not unexpected as the radiation is so weak. There are some experiments that see similar effects in other types of effective horizons (water waves, I think currents, and whatever).
Yes, the primary evidence for Hawking Radiation from black holes is that when we create a horizon in some other wave medium (such as sound waves in a fluid), we get Hawking radiation emitted from the horizon.
 
PeterDonis said:
Hawking didn't come up with this principle, and it is a separate concept from the computation of entropy in terms of the horizon area. See here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holographic_principle
The computation of the black hole entropy, as above, does not depend on the holographic principle; it is the same whether that principle is true or false.

Ok I realized now, but I wondered this (and caused of my initial confusion). Since Hawking was the first one to discover about the computation of entropy in the terms of the horizon area, how come he didn't conclude that all information of physical systems can be located in the area and not volume. How come it needs others (Susskind) to realize this?
 
Edward Wij said:
Since Hawking was the first one to discover about the computation of entropy in the terms of the horizon area, how come he didn't conclude that all information of physical systems can be located in the area and not volume. How come it needs others (Susskind) to realize this?

I couldn't say. Anyway, that's not a question of physics, it's a question of history and human psychology.
 
Abstract The Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) has significantly advanced our ability to study black holes, achieving unprecedented spatial resolution and revealing horizon-scale structures. Notably, these observations feature a distinctive dark shadow—primarily arising from faint jet emissions—surrounded by a bright photon ring. Anticipated upgrades of the EHT promise substantial improvements in dynamic range, enabling deeper exploration of low-background regions, particularly the inner shadow...
what is the current status of the field for quantum cosmology, are there any observations that support any theory of quantum cosmology? is it just cosmology during the Planck era or does it extend past the Planck era. what are the leading candidates into research into quantum cosmology and which physics departments research it? how much respect does loop quantum cosmology has compared to string cosmology with actual cosmologists?
Back
Top