What Is the Correct Magnetic Field for a Strong Zeeman Effect in Sodium?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the correct magnetic field for the strong Zeeman effect in sodium, specifically using the resonance line components at 580 nm, 585 nm, and 590 nm. The participant attempts to calculate the magnetic field using the energy change formula and the Bohr magneton but arrives at an unreasonably high value of 2.6 MT, while the expected range is between 0 and 60 T. The issue is identified as an incorrect calculation of the energy difference. The participant concludes that the problem is resolved, indicating a misunderstanding in the energy calculations. Accurate energy difference calculations are crucial for determining the appropriate magnetic field.
Nick789
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Have to find the applied magnetic field for strong zeeman effect for sodium.

Given three resonance line components
580nm 585nm and 590 nm

Homework Equations



Ezeeman=B*Bohr Magneton*ml
ml= 0,1 or -1

The Attempt at a Solution



Change energy = hf = hc/wavelength
Can't get sensible magnetic field answer

change wavelength: 10nm so change in energy: 1.988x10-17

Bohr Magneton: 9.27 x 10 ^-24 J/T

B= very high answer 2.6 MT and should be low anywhere from 0 - 60 T

Something is wrong here but not sure how to do it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You didn't calculate the energy difference correctly.
 
question is done now
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top