MHB What is the correct slant asymptote for this function and why is it significant?

  • Thread starter Thread starter m3dicat3d
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Asymptote
AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the concept of slant asymptotes in relation to the function given. It emphasizes that while the function approaches the slant asymptote, it never actually crosses it due to the presence of a non-zero remainder in the long division. The calculation shows that the function behaves like -3x + 2 as it approaches infinity, confirming that this line is indeed the slant asymptote. The confusion around the graphical representation of asymptotes is addressed, highlighting the importance of understanding the behavior of the function at extreme values. Overall, the significance of the slant asymptote lies in its role in describing the end behavior of the function.
m3dicat3d
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
View attachment 819Why is the slant asymptote pictured here correct for this function? I was under the impression an asymptote was never crossed by the function. I get that the dividend gives the equation for the asymptote for a non zero remainder, but seeing this graphically is a bit confusing. Thanks! (EDIT: NVM, I just answered my own question:p) Thanks anyways though!
 

Attachments

  • slant asymtope.JPG
    slant asymtope.JPG
    16.5 KB · Views: 108
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If you long divide, you'll see that [math]\displaystyle \frac{-6x^3 + 4x^2 - 1}{2x^2 + 1} \equiv -3x + 2 + \frac{x}{2x^2 + 1} = -3x + 2 + \frac{1}{2x + \frac{1}{x}} [/math].

You can see that the denominator easily overpowers the numerator, and so gets closer to 0, which means the entire function eventually works like [math]\displaystyle -3x + 2[/math]. However, since there is always that tiny bit added, it never actually will be [math]\displaystyle -3x + 2[/math], and so [math]\displaystyle y = -3x + 2[/math] must be an asymptote :)
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top