What is the derivation of the second equation for area velocity?

In summary, the first equation is derived from the fact that the particle moves by the distance traveled multiplied by the altitude of the triangle. The second equation is derived from the fact that the particle moves in the (x, y, 0) plane.
  • #1
Shreya
188
65
Homework Statement
I want to understand the second equation for Areal velocity as given below.
Relevant Equations
Refer below.
Screenshot from 2023-01-19 20-29-43.png
Screenshot from 2023-01-19 20-30-05.png

I think I understand how the first equation comes about.

Screenshot from 2023-01-19 20-43-16.png

In ##dt## the particle travels by ##dr##, I considered it as a triangle with altitude ##r## and base ##dr##. On dividing the area travelled in ##dt## by ##dt## we get the above equation.
A similar argument can be applied to ##\frac 1 2 \rho^2 \frac {d\phi} {dt}## as ##\rho## is same as r and ##\rho \frac {d\phi} {dt}## is same as ##\frac {dr} {dt}##

But, I am not able to understand the 2nd equation. I can provide a similar argument for ##xv_y## but can,t seem to reason any further.
Please be kind to help.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot from 2023-01-19 20-39-16.png
    Screenshot from 2023-01-19 20-39-16.png
    3.8 KB · Views: 85
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The unsigned area swept out in time [itex]\delta t[/itex] is approximately [tex]|\delta S| \approx \tfrac12
\|\mathbf{r} \times (\mathbf{r} + \mathbf{v}\delta t)\| =
\tfrac12 \|\mathbf{r} \times \mathbf{v}\| |\delta t|.[/tex] This is because the magnitude of the cross-product gives the area of the parallelogram bounded by [itex]\mathbf{r}[/itex] and [itex]\mathbf{r} + \mathbf{v} \delta t[/itex], and the area swept out is approximately the area of a triangle which is one half of the parallelogram. Dividing by [itex]\delta t[/itex] and taking the limit [itex]\delta t \to 0[/itex] gives [tex]
\left|\frac{dS}{dt}\right| = \tfrac12 \|\mathbf{r} \times \mathbf{v}\|.[/tex] This is essentially the derivation of the first formula.

To derive the second, in the case of motion in the [itex](x,y,0)[/itex] plane we can calculate [itex]\frac12\|\mathbf{r} \times \mathbf{v}\| [/itex] either in cartesians or in plane polars using the standard formulae [tex]\begin{split}
\mathbf{r} &= r\mathbf{e}_r(\theta) \\
\mathbf{v} &= \dot r \mathbf{e}_r(\theta) + r\dot \theta \mathbf{e}_{\theta}(\theta) \end{split}[/tex] where [tex]
\mathbf{e}_r(\theta) \times \mathbf{e}_\theta(\theta) \equiv \mathbf{e}_z.[/tex] We can then adopt the convention that [itex]S[/itex] increases in the direction of increasing [itex]\theta[/itex] to remove the absolute value signs.
 
  • Like
Likes Shreya
  • #3
pasmith said:
To derive the second, in the case of motion in the (x,y,0) plane we can calculate 12‖r×v‖ either in cartesians or in plane polars using the standard formulae r=rer(θ)v=r˙er(θ)+rθ˙eθ(θ) where er(θ)×eθ(θ)≡ez. We can then adopt the convention that S increases in the direction of increasing θ to remove the absolute value signs.
Thank You so much @pasmith !
##\vec r = x \hat i + y \hat j##
##\vec v = v_x \hat i + v_y \hat j##

##\vec r \times \vec v = (x v_y - y v_x) \hat k##
##\frac {dS} {dt} = \frac 1 2 (xv_y-yv_x)##
Is the above right?
 

FAQ: What is the derivation of the second equation for area velocity?

What is the second equation for area velocity?

The second equation for area velocity typically refers to the continuity equation in fluid dynamics, which is A1V1 = A2V2, where A represents the cross-sectional area and V represents the velocity of the fluid.

Why is the continuity equation important in fluid dynamics?

The continuity equation is crucial because it expresses the principle of conservation of mass in fluid flow. It ensures that the mass flow rate remains constant from one cross-section of a pipe to another, which is essential for analyzing and designing fluid systems.

How is the continuity equation derived?

The continuity equation is derived from the principle of conservation of mass. For an incompressible fluid, the mass flow rate must be constant. This can be mathematically expressed as the product of the cross-sectional area and the velocity of the fluid at any two points along the flow being equal, hence A1V1 = A2V2.

Can the continuity equation be applied to compressible fluids?

Yes, but with modifications. For compressible fluids, the density of the fluid can change with pressure and temperature. The continuity equation for compressible fluids is written as ρ1A1V1 = ρ2A2V2, where ρ represents the fluid density.

What assumptions are made in the derivation of the continuity equation?

The primary assumptions are that the fluid is incompressible and that the flow is steady, meaning the fluid properties at any given point do not change over time. Additionally, it assumes no fluid is added or removed from the system between the two cross-sections being analyzed.

Similar threads

Back
Top