I What Is the Descriptive Meaning of \(- \frac{e}{c}\vec A\)?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Anton Alice
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Term
AI Thread Summary
The term \(- \frac{e}{c}\vec A\) represents the modification of momentum in the presence of an electromagnetic field, specifically indicating the momentum imparted through electromagnetic forces. In the context of Hamiltonian mechanics, the classical Hamiltonian combines kinetic and potential energy, with the potential energy in an electromagnetic field expressed as \(V = e\phi\). The replacement of kinetic momentum \(p\) with canonical momentum \(P - \frac{e}{c}\vec A\) is crucial for accurately describing a particle's dynamics in such fields. The distinction between kinetic momentum \(p\) and canonical momentum \(P\) is essential for understanding how particles behave under electromagnetic influences. This framework allows for a comprehensive analysis of particle dynamics in electromagnetic contexts.
Anton Alice
Messages
68
Reaction score
1
If you want to modify the Hamiltonian by introducing the effect of an electromagnetic field, then the replacement \vec p \rightarrow \vec p - \frac{e}{c}\vec A is applied.

Now my question is, whether there is a descriptive meaning of that extra term - \frac{e}{c}\vec A. As what can I think of that?
Thank you in advance
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
One way to look at it is that it is the momentum imparted through the electromagnetic force,

Momentum wikipedia -
The classical Hamiltonian ℋ for a particle in any field equals the total energy of the system – the kinetic energy T = p2/2m (where p2 = p · p, see dot product) plus the potential energy V. For a particle in an electromagnetic field, the potential energy is V = , and since the kinetic energy T always corresponds to the kinetic momentum p, replacing the kinetic momentum by the above equation (p = PqA) leads to the Hamiltonian in the table.
 
say_cheese said:
For a particle in an electromagnetic field, the potential energy is V = , and since the kinetic energy T always corresponds to the kinetic momentum p, replacing the kinetic momentum by the above equation (p = PqA) leads to the Hamiltonian in the table.
If small type p is the kinetic momentum, what then is capital P?
 
Anton Alice said:
If small type p is the kinetic momentum, what then is capital P?
It's the canonical momentum, i.e., the total momentum of the particle.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Someone who shows interest in science is initially a welcome development. So are fresh ideas from unexpected quarters. In contrast, there is a scientific community that is meticulously organized down to the last detail, allowing little to no external influence. With the invention of social media and other sites on the internet competing for content, unprecedented opportunities have opened up for...
I am going through this course on collision detection: https://siggraphcontact.github.io/ In this link is a PDF called course notes. Scrolling down to section 1.3, called constraints. In this section it is said that we can write bilateral constraints as ##\phi(\mathbf{x}) = 0## and unilateral constraints as ##\phi(\mathbf{x}) \ge 0##. I understand that, but then it says that these constraints call also be written as: $$\mathbf{J} \mathbf{u} = 0, \mathbf{J} \mathbf{u} \ge 0,$$ where...
Back
Top