What is the Donor-Electron Ionization Energy of Silicon Crystal?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ee1215
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electron Energy
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the donor-electron ionization energy of silicon crystal using the provided effective mass and dielectric constant. The formula used for the calculation is ED = -(1/4πε)²[(mc*e⁴) / (2*(h/2π)²)]. An initial calculation yielded an incorrect result of -1.415x10⁻⁵⁴, prompting a review of the values used for mc and ε. After recalculating with correct values, a more reasonable result of -1.4138x10⁻²⁰ Joules was obtained, confirming the importance of careful calculation and unit consistency. The discussion highlights the need for accuracy in mathematical computations in physics problems.
ee1215
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find donor-electron ionziation energy of silicon crystal. Electron effective mass mc=.98mo and dielectric constant ε/εo=12.3

Homework Equations


I use the ED=-(1/4πε)2*[(mc*e4) / (2*(h/2π)2)]


The Attempt at a Solution


My answer of -1.415x10-54 does not seem right. I solved for mc and ε from given equations in the problem and plugged in. Is this correct or have I made a mistake?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What you did is correct in principle. You could made same calculation error or plugged in wrong value for m0. Show your data and calculation. And what unit of energy did you use?

ehild
 
Well, using the ED formula mentioned above. I solved for mc = .98*9.1094x10-31 = 8.927x10-31kg and solved for ε=12.3*8.854x10-12 = 1.089x10-10F/m. Plugged those two equations into ED, and also h-bar = 1.054x10-34Js and e=1.6022x10-19C, I got the answer I mentioned above in my calculation.
 
Your result is impossible. Count the exponents: 4*(-19)+(-31)-(2*(-12)+2*-(34)). It is -15. Multiply the numbers, this gives a magnitude of 10-5. So the result is of magnitude 10-20Joule.

ehild
 
You are correct. Even though I thought I double checked me answer before I posted the question, I just did the calculation and got -1.4138x10-20. This is more reasonable?
 
ee1215 said:
You are correct. Even though I thought I double checked me answer before I posted the question, I just did the calculation and got -1.4138x10-20. This is more reasonable?

Sure!:smile:If you feel the result impossible try to estimate its magnitude without calculator.

ehild
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top