What is the energy-time uncertainty relationship in quantum mechanics?

g.lemaitre
Messages
267
Reaction score
2
This is from Hogdson's book the Mind Matters

These virtual photons may be absorbed by other particles; if so, there is a transmission of electromagnetic force; but, if not, the virtual photons are considered as reabsorbed by the electron (as they must be, to avoid violating laws requiring conservation of energy and momentum). The energy of such virtual photons can be considered as ‘borrowed’, the justification for that being the energy-time uncertainty relationship: the more energetic such virtual photons are. the less will be the time of their existence, so as to ensure that the product of time and ‘borrowed’ energy stays under the Planck constant h.

Does anyone know what the actual equation he is talking about and I was wondering if anyone could give me a few more details regarding the energy-time uncertainly relationship.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I haven't done a QM course yet, but I think this is one of the cases where the Heisenberg's uncertainty principle is misunderstood.

The equation would be: \Delta E\Delta t \geq \frac{\hbar}{2}

What it really means is that \Delta t is the time it takes the system to evolve in time. If the energy uncertainty is very small, the evolution of the system will be very slow (for a thorough analysis consult Griffiths).

In particle physics it can be also thought as the characteristic time for an interaction (or semething like this, someone should explain it better).

But it doesn't mean that you can violate energy conservation. I think in this case it's related to summing up Feynman diagrams, so the total sum does verify energy conservation.
 
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top