MHB What is the equivalent identity for $\sin^2\omega t$?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding equivalent identities for the expression $\sin^2(\omega t)$. Two key identities are highlighted: $\sin^2(\theta) = 1 - \cos^2(\theta)$ and $\sin^2(\theta) = \frac{1 - \cos(2\theta)}{2}$. Participants clarify that by substituting $\theta = \omega t$, these identities can be directly applied to $\sin^2(\omega t)$. This substitution allows for the expressions $\sin^2(\omega t) = 1 - \cos^2(\omega t)$ and $\sin^2(\omega t) = \frac{1 - \cos(2\omega t)}{2}$. The conversation emphasizes the importance of recognizing the substitution to utilize the identities effectively.
Drain Brain
143
0
is there an equivalent identity for $\sin^2\omega t?$

please tell me.REGARDS!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It depends on what you want the identity to be in terms of...two identities that spring to mind are:



 
MarkFL said:
It depends on what you want the identity to be in terms of...two identities that spring to mind are:

$$\sin^2(\theta)=1-\cos^2(\theta)$$

$$\sin^2(\theta)=\frac{1-\cos(2\theta)}{2}$$

I'm familiar with what you've posted. But $\sin^2(\omega t)$ doesn't fit the form of just $sin^2(\theta)$. I'm confused, how am I suppose to use those identities above?
 
Drain Brain said:
I'm familiar with what you've posted. But $\sin^2(\omega t)$ doesn't fit the form of just $sin^2(\theta)$. I'm confused, how am I suppose to use those identities above?

Substitute $\theta=\omega t$ to get:



 
Drain Brain said:
I'm familiar with what you've posted. But $\sin^2(\omega t)$ doesn't fit the form of just $sin^2(\theta)$. I'm confused, how am I suppose to use those identities above?

With $\theta=\omega t$ it fits the form exactly. :D
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top