What Is the Final Speed of an Electron Accelerated Through 200V?

AI Thread Summary
An electron accelerated through a potential difference of 200V gains 200 eV of kinetic energy, which can be calculated using the equation K = 1/2 m v^2. The initial speed of the electron is 2.0 x 10^-6 m/s, and its mass is 9.11 x 10^-31 kg. To find the final speed, one can rearrange the kinetic energy formula to solve for velocity. The discussion highlights the simplicity of the solution once understood, reflecting on the nature of scientific discovery. Overall, the forum emphasizes the importance of using fundamental physics principles to solve the problem efficiently.
fran008
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I have this question that I have been pondering about for over an hour now :
What is the final speed of an electron accelerated through a potential difference of 200V if it has an initial speed of 2.0x10-6C and mass of electron +9.11x10-31.
Now I read the forum rules and I knowI have to help myself if I want others to help me...but I am totally stuck: because the only method I can think of is obviously wrong i.e. finging the weight of electron and that being the electrical force. Also even if I got that and could get the electric field strenght and distance between the pd...what next?
Thanks
Fran008
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Then you would say that the total force is the electric force (F=qE) and follow Newtons second law (F=ma) and combining the two you can find the acceleration (while in the field).
 
yes but then how do you find the resulting velocity once out of the field?
 
With v_f = v_i + at [/tex] but you'd need to know how long you were in the field or atleast how far youve traveled in the field.
 
This problem is much simpler than you're making it out to be, whozum. I've told you before not to answer if you're not sure you are helping!

An electron accelerated through a potential difference of 200V will gain 200 eV of kinetic energy. All you need to do is use K = 1/2 m v^2 to find its final velocity.

- Warren
 
Oh thanks that was relatively simple! But its always like that when you manage to solve it!Even great scientists agree...Im currently reading "The Double Helix" and it says that after they cracked DNA structure they thought"how simple why didnt we see it before"! LOL!

Thanks loadz...great forum bdw :)
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top