What is the Identity Property of Determinants and its Relation to Linearity?

twoflower
Messages
363
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I don't understand one thing about linearity of determinants. In the book I have:

<br /> \det \left( \begin{array}{ccc} . &amp; . &amp; . \\ . &amp; . &amp; . \\ \mbox{<i>} \\ . &amp; . &amp; . \\ . &amp; . &amp; . \\ . &amp; . &amp; . \\ \mbox{[j]} \end{array} \right) = \det \left( \begin{array}{ccc} . &amp; . &amp; . \\ . &amp; . &amp; . \\ \mbox{<i>} \\ . &amp; . &amp; . \\ . &amp; . &amp; . \\ . &amp; . &amp; . \\ \mbox{[j+i]} \end{array} \right) <br /> </i></i>

And the explanation is:

<br /> \det \left( \begin{array}{ccc} . &amp; . &amp; . \\ . &amp; . &amp; . \\ \mbox{<i>} \\ . &amp; . &amp; . \\ . &amp; . &amp; . \\ . &amp; . &amp; . \\ \mbox{[j+i]} \end{array} \right) = \det \left( \begin{array}{ccc} . &amp; . &amp; . \\ . &amp; . &amp; . \\ \mbox{<i>} \\ . &amp; . &amp; . \\ . &amp; . &amp; . \\ . &amp; . &amp; . \\ \mbox{[j]} \end{array} \right) + \det \left( \begin{array}{ccc} . &amp; . &amp; . \\ . &amp; . &amp; . \\ \mbox{<i>} \\ . &amp; . &amp; . \\ . &amp; . &amp; . \\ . &amp; . &amp; . \\ \mbox{<i>} \end{array} \right)<br /> </i></i></i></i>

But I can't see how these two matrixes (I mean now left and right side of the bottom equation) can be identical, because when I sum the two matrixes on the right, I won't get the matrix on the left...

Thank you for the explanation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You shouldn't add the bottom right matrices, since they are determinants. The last determinant is zero because two rows are equal.
To see why the equality is true, expand the first along the last row.
 
Galileo said:
You shouldn't add the bottom right matrices, since they are determinants. The last determinant is zero because two rows are equal.
To see why the equality is true, expand the first along the last row.

This property of determinant is before expaning along rows/columns, so I think it should be possible to see it even simplier.

I know they are determinants, but I suppose that if

A = B + C
then det(A) = det(B) + det(C)
 
Here's a special case that might help:

\vec A\times (\vec B +\vec A) = \vec A\times\vec B +\vec A\times \vec A= \vec A\times\vec B

twoflower said:
I know they are determinants, but I suppose that if

A = B + C
then det(A) = det(B) + det(C)

This is generally false.
Let B=\left(\begin{array}{cc} 1 &amp; 0 \\ 0 &amp;0 \end{array} \right) and C=\left(\begin{array}{cc} 0&amp; 0 \\ 0 &amp;1 \end{array} \right). These have zero determinant... so the sum of the determinants is zero. However, the matrix sum has determinant 1.
 
Thank you, I think I have it. I just have to write the expression for the determinant of the matrix on the left side and I can split it into two determinants equal to the ones on the right side. Thanks.
 
Thread 'Derivation of equations of stress tensor transformation'
Hello ! I derived equations of stress tensor 2D transformation. Some details: I have plane ABCD in two cases (see top on the pic) and I know tensor components for case 1 only. Only plane ABCD rotate in two cases (top of the picture) but not coordinate system. Coordinate system rotates only on the bottom of picture. I want to obtain expression that connects tensor for case 1 and tensor for case 2. My attempt: Are these equations correct? Is there more easier expression for stress tensor...
Back
Top