What is the Impact of k on Wave Behavior and Its Physical Significance?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the impact of the complex quantity k on wave behavior, particularly in the context of light waves represented by the equation e^iw(t-nx/c). Substituting n with n-ik reveals that k introduces a real term in the exponent, affecting the wave's characteristics. The resulting expression indicates that the wave exhibits damping, with the term e^{-kx/c} suggesting that the amplitude decreases over distance. A larger value of k correlates with a faster decay of the wave's amplitude. This analysis highlights the significance of k in determining the physical behavior of waves, specifically in terms of damping effects.
Wishbone
Messages
139
Reaction score
0
The problem gives the angular frequency of a light wave (w) is represented by


e^iw(t-nx/c)

it says that sometimes n is replaced by the complex quantity n-ik.

The question asks what is the effect of k on the wave. Also, it asks, what is its physical signifigance?


I tried substituting in for n-ik for n, and then multiplying in the iw.


I got: e^ (iwt-iwnx +kx)/c

So I see that the k term is the only real term in the exponent, however I am not sure how that effects the wave, or what its physical signifigance is.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think that is correct. Doing the calculations, I get, after putting into an illuminating form:

e^{-kx/c}e^{i(wt-nx/c)}

What kind of a wave is that? (i.e. what is the effect of k on the wave?)
 
thats a dampened wave, isn't it?
 
and the larger the K, the quicker the wave dies?
 
yep.

------
 
sweet, thanks dude.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top