What is the Interaction Hamiltonian in Quantum Mechanics?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the Interaction Hamiltonian in quantum mechanics, specifically the Hamiltonian H_{SE} and its application to quantum states. The first part of the homework involves expressing H_{SE} in terms of quantum states, with a correction noted that summation over j is unnecessary due to the basis correspondence. The second part requires applying the Taylor expansion for the exponential of H_{SE}, followed by calculating H_{SE} squared and generalizing to higher powers. Participants express confusion regarding the summation and seek clarification on the relationship between the indices. The conversation highlights the complexities of understanding interaction Hamiltonians and Dirac notation in quantum mechanics.
The thinker
Messages
54
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Write out:

H_{SE}(\left|\right\beta,i_{\beta}\rangle\otimes\left|\right e_{j}\rangle)

and

exp(-iH_{SE}t)(\left|\right\beta,i_{\beta}\rangle\otimes\left|\right e_{j}\rangle)


Where:

H_{SE}=\sum_{\alpha,j}\gamma(\alpha,j)P^{(\alpha)}\otimes\left|e_{j}\right\rangle\left\langle e_{j}\right|

and

P^{(\alpha)}=\sum_{i_{\alpha}}\left|i_{\alpha}\right\rangle\left\langle i_{\alpha}\right|


(\left|i_{\alpha}\right\rangle can be written \left|\right\alpha,i_{\alpha}\rangle where alpha is a quantum number indexed by i_{\alpha} )

The Attempt at a Solution



For the first part I'm fairly sure it comes out as:

\sum_{\beta,j}\gamma(\beta,j)\left|\right\beta,i_{\beta}\rangle\otimes\left|\right e_{j}\rangle


But the second part I am not sure of, is it something like:

(Cos(t)-i\gamma(\alpha,j)Sin(t))(\left|\right\beta,i_{\beta}\rangle\otimes\left|\right e_{j}\rangle)


Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In the first you should not summate over j (and you need to explain why ;))

For the second you first apply the Taylor expansion for the exponential. After that, compute:

H_{SE}^2 followed by generalizing this to H_{SE}^n.
 
Thanks for that.

I'll have a bash at that.. although I honestly can't see why you wouldn't sum over j
 
Oh wait... is it because the e_{j} basis correspond to different alpha's but not i's?

Edit: Actually on second thought that doesn't make sense because we are summing over alpha(beta).
 
Can anyone else offer some more help?

-I've been teaching myself dirac notation as part of my project this year. This is the first time I've looked at interaction Hamiltonians.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top