What is the LJ cohesive energy expression for a 4-atom square configuration?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the Lennard-Jones (LJ) cohesive energy expression for a four-atom square configuration and determining the equilibrium nearest-neighbor separation. The relevant equation for total energy is provided, and the user has successfully completed the first two parts of the homework. However, they are uncertain about alternative configurations that could minimize LJ energy further. It is noted that while higher coordination numbers in structures like bcc, hcp, and fcc might suggest higher cohesive energies, the negative nature of potential energy in these configurations indicates stronger stability. Ultimately, a simple cubic structure is suggested as a potential alternative that could lower the LJ energy.
blueyellow

Homework Statement



i) Write down an expression for the LJ cohesive energy of a molecule consisting of four atoms lying on the corners of a square of side a.
ii) Deduce the equilibrium value of the nearest-neighbour separation, a, assuming the molecule retains its square shape
iii) What other configuration could the molecule adopt that would lower its LJ energy further?

Relevant equation:

U_{tot}=2N\epsilon[A_{12}(\frac{σ}{a})^{12}-A_{6}(\frac{σ}{a})^{6}]

The Attempt at a Solution



I have done parts i) and ii). It is part iii) that I am stuck on. Because bcc, hcp and fcc all have higher N, number of atoms per unit cell, and higher values of A_{12}, making the cohesive energy higher - this is the case, isn't it? So what other configuration could the molecule adopt?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


yes and no. you have to realize that U is a potential energy and therefore negative in nature. you have to do work to remove these molecules from their square setup into something else. in a simple cubic structure ( 2 sets of these squares make a simple cubic of 8 atoms), the cohesive energy between the molecules is stronger, and so the the potential U is more negative at the equilibrium position, making these bonds more stable.so yes N increases, and maybe even A12, A6 increase, but U is inherently negative making the cohesive energies stronger.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top