What is the mass of 55 Cancri in kg and solar masses?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lauren0619
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass
AI Thread Summary
The mass of 55 Cancri was calculated using the average values of R^3/T^2 from three orbiting planets, resulting in an initial estimate of 1.73 x 10^31 kg. After recalculating the average to 3.13 x 10^18, the corrected mass was found to be 1.85 x 10^30 kg. This value is confirmed to be in kilograms, with no additional conversions needed. The conversion to solar masses yielded a result of approximately 0.93 Ms. The calculations and conversions were deemed reasonable based on the provided data.
Lauren0619
Messages
11
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


I have to find the mass of 55 Cancri in kg using the average orbits of 3 orbiting planets. Specifically, "Using the average of the values of R^3/T^2 that you filled in just for planets c, f, and d in #2, approximately what is the mass of 55 Cancri in kg?
planet c = 3.14 x 10^18
planet f = 3.16 x 10^18
planet d = 3.10 x 10^18

Then to convert the mass in kg to solar masses.

Homework Equations


M=(4pi^2/G)(R^3/T^2) With T equaling the period

The Attempt at a Solution


(3.14 x 10^18) + (3.16 x 10^18) + (3.10 x 10^18) / 3 = 7.3 x 10^31
M= (4pi^2/6.67x10^11)(7.3x10^18) = 1.73x10^31 kg

Is this correct? Or is this value in another form that I need to convert to kg?

And then would it convert to 8.70 Ms (solar masses)?

Please help! Thank you all!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
All of your data values are close to 3 x 1018, so I would expect their average to be similar. Check your average calculation.
 
  • Like
Likes Lauren0619
gneill said:
All of your data values are close to 3 x 1018, so I would expect their average to be similar. Check your average calculation.
Thanks gneill! I redid the calculations. You were right. For my average I got 3.13x10^18. I plugged that into the formula to calculate mass and got 1.85x10^30 kg. Is this correct?
 
Yes, that looks much better.
 
  • Like
Likes Lauren0619
gneill said:
Yes, that looks much better.
Cool! And just to be sure, this is in kilograms, right? I wasn't sure if there was a conversion that I needed to do that was missing.

Also, I redid the conversion to solar masses from kilograms and got .93Ms.
 
Lauren0619 said:
Cool! And just to be sure, this is in kilograms, right? I wasn't sure if there was a conversion that I needed to do that was missing.
Your problem statement didn't mention what units the R^3/T^2 values were given in so I can't say decisively, but it would make sense that they'd be in ##m^3/s^2##, giving you a result in kg.
Also, I redid the conversion to solar masses from kilograms and got .93Ms.
That looks reasonable.
 
  • Like
Likes Lauren0619
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
Back
Top