What Is the Meaning of Thermokinetics?

AI Thread Summary
Thermokinetics is discussed as a term that lacks a clear, consistent definition across various sources, with Wikipedia noting it relates to the rate of chemical decomposition, while dictionaries and books provide vague descriptions. The discussion reveals skepticism about its status as a standard term, with some participants suggesting that mastering the underlying technology is more important than focusing on terminology. A participant seeks clarification on the term due to a translation task for a physicist, highlighting the challenges translators face when dealing with specialized fields. The conversation emphasizes the need for precise terminology in scientific translation, even if the term itself is not widely recognized. Ultimately, the lack of clarity around "thermokinetics" raises questions about its relevance in scientific discourse.
nomadreid
Gold Member
Messages
1,750
Reaction score
243
Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermokinetics says that "thermokinetics" studies the rate of chemical decomposition, whereas a dictionary https://www.yourdictionary.com/thermokinetic gets no further than saying that it combines thermodynamics and kinetics, and a book on it https://books.google.co.il/books?id...CXoECAEQAQ#v=onepage&q=thermokinetics&f=false introduces it in such vague terms as to appear meaningless... etc. I could get no consistent definition of it, and I suspect that it is not a standard term. But maybe I am looking in the wrong places. Is it a standard term, and if so, what is its precise meaning? Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why is it so important for you to have a precise definition of this term? I actually have never heard it before, and I couldn't care less. Your objective should be to master the technology, and not be so concerned with terminology. If you want a really good book on chemical reactor kinetics and heat transfer, see Octave Levenspiel's book Chemical Reaction Engineering, or Scott Fogler's book The Elements of Chemical Kinetics and Reactor Calculations.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
Chestermiller, thanks for the indirect answer -- that you had never heard of the term. The reason I wished to know the exact term was simply that I was translating an article for a Russian physicist; he had used this term in his own (flawed) attempt to translate it himself into English, but I suspected this was due to the Russian penchant for coining terms. In an ideal world, translators would be well versed in the fields that they translate, but in reality usually only translators with a scientific background but not necessarily in the same field as the article is all that is usually available. That is, since this is not my field, I wished to have confirmation from those in the corresponding field before I advised said physicist not to use the term.

Alas, I cannot learn all fields about which I translate in depth. It would be nice, but...
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and Delta2
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...

Similar threads

Back
Top