MHB What is the name of this theorem in Abstract Algebra

Amer
Messages
259
Reaction score
0
Hi,
There is a theorem in Abstract which said if g.c.d(x,y)= d (g.c.d the greatest common divisor between x and y) then there exist an integers a,b such that

ax + by = d

It is a corollary from Euclidean algorithm.

Does it has a name ?
Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Amer said:
Hi,
There is a theorem in Abstract which said if g.c.d(x,y)= d (g.c.d the greatest common divisor between x and y) then there exist an integers a,b such that

ax + by = d

It is a corollary from Euclidean algorithm.

Does it has a name ?
Thanks in advance.

In...

Number Theory/Elementary Divisibility - Wikibooks, open books for an open world

... the theorem is indicated simply as 'theorem I'...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
Thanks very much, you are great. :D
 
Not only do the integers $a$ and $b$ exist, but furthermore $d$ is minimal among all POSITIVE $\Bbb Z$-linear combinations of $x$ and $y$.

The reason this is important, is because $a,b$ are in general, not unique, but $d$ is. For example:

gcd(4,6) = 2, and we have:

2 = (1)(6) + (-1)(4) but also:

2 = (-5)(6) + (8)(4) (for example).

The Bezout identity is so useful that integral domains in which it holds are given their own name: Bezout domains (this is a slightly stronger condition than any two elements just having a gcd). These domains are "almost PID's (principal ideal domains)", they share many of the same properties of PID's, but do not have to be Noetherian.

Perhaps this is "too much information". Simpler version: there are many kinds of structures in which SOME of the intuitions we have from integers still apply, but not ALL of them.
 
Deveno said:
Not only do the integers $a$ and $b$ exist, but furthermore $d$ is minimal among all POSITIVE $\Bbb Z$-linear combinations of $x$ and $y$.

The reason this is important, is because $a,b$ are in general, not unique, but $d$ is. For example:

gcd(4,6) = 2, and we have:

2 = (1)(6) + (-1)(4) but also:

2 = (-5)(6) + (8)(4) (for example).

The Bezout identity is so useful that integral domains in which it holds are given their own name: Bezout domains (this is a slightly stronger condition than any two elements just having a gcd). These domains are "almost PID's (principal ideal domains)", they share many of the same properties of PID's, but do not have to be Noetherian.

Perhaps this is "too much information". Simpler version: there are many kinds of structures in which SOME of the intuitions we have from integers still apply, but not ALL of them.

Awesome additions, thanks
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Determine whether ##125## is a unit in ##\mathbb{Z_471}##'
This is the question, I understand the concept, in ##\mathbb{Z_n}## an element is a is a unit if and only if gcd( a,n) =1. My understanding of backwards substitution, ... i have using Euclidean algorithm, ##471 = 3⋅121 + 108## ##121 = 1⋅108 + 13## ##108 =8⋅13+4## ##13=3⋅4+1## ##4=4⋅1+0## using back-substitution, ##1=13-3⋅4## ##=(121-1⋅108)-3(108-8⋅13)## ... ##= 121-(471-3⋅121)-3⋅471+9⋅121+24⋅121-24(471-3⋅121## ##=121-471+3⋅121-3⋅471+9⋅121+24⋅121-24⋅471+72⋅121##...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
It is well known that a vector space always admits an algebraic (Hamel) basis. This is a theorem that follows from Zorn's lemma based on the Axiom of Choice (AC). Now consider any specific instance of vector space. Since the AC axiom may or may not be included in the underlying set theory, might there be examples of vector spaces in which an Hamel basis actually doesn't exist ?
Back
Top