What is the Potential Difference Between c and d in This Circuit?

In summary: When you simplify component networks you lose analytical access to nodes that get absorbed into the replacement components. Sometimes you just have to leave some components unsimplified to retain access to nodes you need.
  • #71
gracy said:
V in is always the emf of source
It can be source voltage but precisely, it is the total voltage across the series combination.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #72
gracy said:
I want to understand what the formula means how to use it
php?image=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.sparkfun.com%2Fassets%2Fe%2F7%2F6%2F3%2Fc%2F511968d9ce395f7c54000000.png

at the left side there will be voltage across the numerator on right side.
V in is always the emf of source
and denominator on the right side would be sum of all the component(resistance or capacitor) present.
numerator on the right side is always the component (resistance or capacitor) across which we want to find the voltage i.e V present on left side.
Refer to the derivation that you copied. The derivation used the fact that all the resistors in a series string share the same current. Then Ohm's law can be used with that current to find the voltage across anyone of the resistors in the string. It happened to be R2 in this example.

So in the case of resistors, since the common factor for all the resistors in a string is the shared current you determined that current first. That's ##I = V_{in}/R_{eff}##, where I choose this time to name the total resistance ##R_{eff}##, or the effective resistance of the string. You could call it ##R_{tot}## if you want. Then Ohm's law tells you the voltage across any resistor in the string by multiplying the current by that resistor value.
$$V_{Rj} = V_{in} \frac{R_j}{R_{eff}}$$
Now, what is the common factor shared by all capacitors in a series string?
 
  • Like
Likes gracy
  • #73
gneill said:
Now, what is the common factor shared by all capacitors in a series string?
Capacitors in Series all have the same current flowing through them
 
  • #74
gracy said:
Capacitors in Series all have the same current flowing through them
Right. But current ceases in steady state. What else is common?
 
  • #75
Please tell me am I correct in#68 that
Here in the following equation
%252F%252Fcdn.sparkfun.com%252Fassets%252Fe%252F7%252F6%252F3%252Fc%252F511968d9ce395f7c54000000.png

on the left side there is voltage across the numerator on right side.
V in is always the emf of source
and denominator on the right side would be sum of all the component(resistance or capacitor) present.
numerator on the right side is always the component (resistance or capacitor) across which we want to find the voltage i.e V present on left side.
 
  • #76
gracy said:
Please tell me am I correct in#68 that
Here in the following equation
%252F%252Fcdn.sparkfun.com%252Fassets%252Fe%252F7%252F6%252F3%252Fc%252F511968d9ce395f7c54000000.png

on the left side there is voltage across the numerator on right side.
V in is always the emf of source
and denominator on the right side would be sum of all the component(resistance or capacitor) present.
numerator on the right side is always the component (resistance or capacitor) across which we want to find the voltage i.e V present on left side.
Correct for resistors and inductors and not capacitors, as I said in #70.
 
  • Like
Likes gracy
  • #77
gracy said:
Please tell me am I correct in#68 that...
See post #72.

That is what gneill was doing; in a way that might lead to better overall understanding on your part.

(Post # changed in Edit.)
 
Last edited:
  • #78
cnh1995 said:
What else is common?
The equivalent charge is the same as the individual charges.
 
  • #79
gracy said:
The equivalent charge is the same as the individual charges.
Right.
 
  • Like
Likes gracy
  • #80
Now how to proceed from here?
 
  • #81
gracy said:
Now how to proceed from here?
For how many capacitors in series? The formula will change as the number goes up.
 
  • #82
cnh1995 said:
For how many capacitors in series? The formula will change as the number goes up.
This is why it's better to understand the concept rather than try to memorize individual formulas. The concept applies to any number components in series, and a correct formula can be written down every time from the principle involved.

- Find out what is common to every component
- Calculate that common thing
- Apply the common thing's value to the individual component that you're interest in
 
  • Like
Likes gracy and cnh1995
  • #83
gneill said:
Find out what is common to every component
charge
 
  • #84
gracy said:
Now how to proceed from here?
Calculate total charge from the equation Qtotal=Ceq*V. Then simply use Vconcerned=Qtotal/Cconcerned.
 
  • Like
Likes gracy
  • #85
cnh1995 said:
Qtotal=Ceq*V.
100 multiplied by 8μC
800 μC=Qtotal
Right?
 
  • #86
gracy said:
100 multiplied by 8μC
800 μC=Qtotal
Right?
You have to consider only the series combination .
olu-png.92894.png
 
  • Like
Likes gracy
  • #87
100 multiplied by 2μC
200 μC=Qtotal
Right?
 
  • #88
gracy said:
100 multiplied by 2μC
200 μC=Qtotal
Right?
Right. Qtotal for the series combination.
 
  • Like
Likes gracy
  • #89
cnh1995 said:
Then simply use Vconcerned=Qtotal/Cconcerned.
Vcd=200 μC/6μF
=100/3 Volts
Right?
 
  • #90
gracy said:
Vcd=200 μC/6μF
=100/3 Volts
Right?
Correct:smile:
 
  • Like
Likes gracy
  • #91
I also have to show charge distribution on capacitor plates.
 
  • #92
But we did not use voltage divider rule anywhere.
 
  • #93
gracy said:
But we did not use voltage divider rule anywhere.
We didn't have to. We simply followed the instructions from gneill in #82.
cnh1995 said:
It will be not as straightforward as it is for resistors. Because resistors is series add directly while capacitors in series don't.. You can derive it but can't memorize it because it will change with number of capacitors.
 
  • Like
Likes gracy
  • #94
cnh1995 said:
We didn't have to
But I want to learn,I will create a separate thread on it.
cnh1995 said:
We simply followed the instructions from gneill in #82.
Can we solve all the problems with these steps that can be solved with voltage divider rule ?
 
  • #95
gracy said:
I also have to show charge distribution on capacitor plates.
You can do that using the information you calculated (the Q on each capacitor).
gracy said:
But we did not use voltage divider rule anywhere.
You used the general voltage divider principle though, which boils down to the voltage divider rule when only two components are involved. The general principle is more flexible and can be applied in more situations without having to memorize a bunch of different formulas.

If you try it for a "string" of two capacitors and keep track of the algebra you will derive the voltage divider rule for two capacitors.
 
  • Like
Likes gracy and cnh1995
  • #96
gracy said:
Can we solve all the problems with these steps that can be solved with voltage divider rule ?
Yes. Actually voltage divider rule for resistors is nothing but these steps. You can verify.
 
  • Like
Likes gracy
  • #97
Ok.Then I will not learn voltage divider rule .
 
  • #99
Okay. A quick visual summary of what's behind the general voltage division principle for components in series:

Fig2.PNG


Used with just two components the principle yields the Voltage Divider rule(s) for that component type:
$$V_{R1} = V_{in} \frac{R1}{R1 + R2}~~~~~~V_{R2} = V_{in} \frac{R2}{R1 + R2}$$
$$V_{C1} = V_{in} \frac{C2}{C1 + C2}~~~~~~V_{C2} = V_{in} \frac{C1}{C1 + C2}$$

Note the subtle difference in the rules for the resistor and capacitor (pay close attention to what's in the numerators of the fractions). You don't need to remember this quirk if you always start with the basic principle.

(edit: Updated the figure to fix a subscript mixup)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes gracy and cnh1995
  • #100
in the picture why ##V_{Rn}## =##I####R_n## and ##V_{Cn}##=##\frac{Q}{C_n}## is not shown

This is true if only two resistance and capacitor are present

##V_{R1}## = ##V_{in}## ##\frac{R1}{R1 + R2}##~~~~~~##V_{R2}## =##V_{in}## ##\frac{R2}{R1 + R2}##

##V_{C1}## = ##V_{in}## ##\frac{C2}{C1 + C2}##~~~~~~##V_{C2}##= ##V_{in}## ##\frac{C1}{C1 + C2}##

But let's take the example of picture here there are five resistance

Then ##V_{R1}##
##V_{R1}## = ##V_{in}## ##\frac{R1}{R1 + R2+R_j+R_(n-1)+R_n}##

Right?

I am unable to write the same for capacitors

I'll give it a try

##V_{C1}##=##V_{in}## ##\frac{C2C_jC_{n-1}C_n+C_1C_jC_{n-1}Cn+C1C2C_n-1+Cn+C1C2CjCn+C1C2CjC_n-1}{C1C2CjC_{n-1}Cn}##
 
Last edited:
  • #101
gracy said:
VR1V_{R1} = VinV_{in} R1R1+R2+Rj+R(n−1)+Rn\frac{R1}{R1 + R2+R_j+R_(n-1)+R_n}

Right?
Right.
gracy said:
I am unable to write the same for capacitors
That's because series capacitors don't add directly.
 
  • Like
Likes gracy
  • #102
gracy said:
I'll give it a try

VC1V_{C1}=VinV_{in} C2CjCn−1Cn+C1CjCn−1Cn+C1C2Cn−1+Cn+C1C2CjCn+C1C2CjCn−1C1C2CjCn−1Cn
I believe the summation part in the numerator should be in the denominator. Also, you can verify this formula by putting n=2.
 
  • #103
gracy said:
in the picture why ##V_{Rn}## =##I####R_n## and ##V_{Cn}##=##\frac{Q}{C_n}## is not shown

It is just typo. The last formulas were meant VRn=IRn and VCn=Q/Cn
Keep in mind that the voltages add when the components are connected in series. The total voltage across the chain of resistors is
Vin = I (R1+R2+...+Rn),
and in case of series capacitors is
Vin=Q/(C1+C2+...+CN).

In case of resistors,
##I=\frac{V_{in}}{R_1+R_2+...R_n}## and the voltage across the i-th element is ##V_i=IR_i=V_{in}\frac{R_i}{R_1+R_2+...+R_n}##.

In case of capacitors,
##Q=\frac{V_{in}}{1/C_1+1/C_2+...+1/C_n}## and the voltage across the i-th element is ##V_i=Q/C_i=V_{in}\frac{1/C_i}{1/C_1+1/C_2+...+1/C_n}##.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes gracy
  • #104
ehild said:
i-th element
Any random element ?
 
  • #105
Should not it be ##V_i##=Q/##C_i##=##V_{in}####\frac{1/C_i}{1/C_1+1/C_2+...+1/C_n}##
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
67
Views
10K
Replies
12
Views
7K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top