MHB What is the probability the second orange is sour if the first one is sour?

  • Thread starter Thread starter evinda
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the probability that the second orange is sour given that the first one is sour, based on two farmers' oranges. Farmer A has 10% sour oranges, while Farmer B has 4%. The client randomly selects a farmer and then two oranges, leading to the application of Bayes' Theorem for the calculation. The probability of both oranges being sour is derived from the individual probabilities of selecting each farmer and their respective sour orange rates. The final computed probability of the second orange being sour, given the first is sour, is 29/350.
evinda
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,741
Reaction score
0
Hello! (Wave)

A farmer $Α$ has oranges, $10 \%$ of which are sour. A farmer $Β$ has oranges, $4\%$ of which are sour. A client chooses per chance ( with propability $\frac{1}{2}$) two oranges.
Which is the probability, if the first orange that he chooses is sour, that the second is also sour?

I drawed the following diagram:View attachment 3911Could this help? (Thinking)
 

Attachments

  • Tbiwo.jpg
    Tbiwo.jpg
    22.4 KB · Views: 79
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi! (Thinking)

That should help, but I think a couple of levels are missing in the decision tree.

I think the first decision the client makes (or rather, the first probability event that occurs) is whether he chooses farmer A or farmer B. (Thinking)
So the root of the tree should have 2 children: A and B, each with probability 1/2.

What do you think the second decision or event is? (Wondering)
 
:Hello, evinda!

Farmer $Α$ has oranges, 10% of which are sour.
Farmer $Β$ has oranges, 4% of which are sour.
A client chooses a farmer at random, then two of his oranges.
What is the probability, if the first orange is sour,
that the second is also sour?
Bayes' Theorem: $\:P(\text{2nd sour }|\text{1st sour}) \;=\;\dfrac{P(\text{both sour})}{P(\text{1st sour})}$

$P(A) = \frac{1}{2}$
$P(A \wedge \text{1st sour}) = \frac{1}{2}\frac{10}{100}$
$P(A \wedge \text{both sour}) = \frac{1}{2}(\frac{10}{100})^2$

$P(B) = \frac{1}{2}$
$P(B \wedge \text{1st sour}) = \frac{1}{2}\frac{4}{100}$
$P(B \wedge \text{both sour}) = \frac{1}{2}(\frac{4}{100})^2$

$P(\text{both sour}) \:=\: \frac{1}{2}(\frac{10}{100})^2 + \frac{1}{2}(\frac{4}{100})^2 \:=\:\frac{116}{20,000} \:=\:\frac{29}{5000}$

$P(\text{1st sour}) \:=\:\frac{10}{200} + \frac{4}{200} \:=\:\frac{14}{200} \:=\:\frac{7}{100}$

Therefore: $\:P(\text{2nd sour }|\text{ 1st sour}) \;=\; \dfrac{\frac{29}{5000}}{\frac{7}{100}} \;=\;\dfrac{29}{350}$
 
Hello, I'm joining this forum to ask two questions which have nagged me for some time. They both are presumed obvious, yet don't make sense to me. Nobody will explain their positions, which is...uh...aka science. I also have a thread for the other question. But this one involves probability, known as the Monty Hall Problem. Please see any number of YouTube videos on this for an explanation, I'll leave it to them to explain it. I question the predicate of all those who answer this...
I'm taking a look at intuitionistic propositional logic (IPL). Basically it exclude Double Negation Elimination (DNE) from the set of axiom schemas replacing it with Ex falso quodlibet: ⊥ → p for any proposition p (including both atomic and composite propositions). In IPL, for instance, the Law of Excluded Middle (LEM) p ∨ ¬p is no longer a theorem. My question: aside from the logic formal perspective, is IPL supposed to model/address some specific "kind of world" ? Thanks.
I was reading a Bachelor thesis on Peano Arithmetic (PA). PA has the following axioms (not including the induction schema): $$\begin{align} & (A1) ~~~~ \forall x \neg (x + 1 = 0) \nonumber \\ & (A2) ~~~~ \forall xy (x + 1 =y + 1 \to x = y) \nonumber \\ & (A3) ~~~~ \forall x (x + 0 = x) \nonumber \\ & (A4) ~~~~ \forall xy (x + (y +1) = (x + y ) + 1) \nonumber \\ & (A5) ~~~~ \forall x (x \cdot 0 = 0) \nonumber \\ & (A6) ~~~~ \forall xy (x \cdot (y + 1) = (x \cdot y) + x) \nonumber...
Back
Top