What is the proof for GCD(n.m)=1 if 2^m-1 and 2^n-1 have a common divisor of 1?

  • Thread starter Thread starter HussamLawen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theory
HussamLawen
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi

i need help to prove this theory:
GCD(n.m)=1 <=> GCD((2^n)-1,(2^m)-1)=1

n,m real numbers
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sorry n,m Integers****
 
I don't have yet a proof (thus I'm not completely convinced of the fact yet), but I believe this is a start:

The polynomial x^k-1 is divisible by x-1; actually, x^k-1 factors as (x-1)(x^{k-1}+x^{k-2}+ ... +x^3+x^2+x+1). Applying this with x = 2^n you deduce that 2^n-1 divides 2^{k n}-1.
 
If an integer r divides 2^m-1 and 2^n-1, then 2^m\equiv2^n\equiv1\bmod r

By the Euculidean algorithm, since m and n are relatively prime, there exists a and b such that am+bn=1.

Thus 2^{am+bn}\equiv2\equiv(2^{am})(2^{bn})\equiv(1^a)(1^b)\equiv1\bmod r Thus r equals 1.
 
Last edited:
The world of 2\times 2 complex matrices is very colorful. They form a Banach-algebra, they act on spinors, they contain the quaternions, SU(2), su(2), SL(2,\mathbb C), sl(2,\mathbb C). Furthermore, with the determinant as Euclidean or pseudo-Euclidean norm, isu(2) is a 3-dimensional Euclidean space, \mathbb RI\oplus isu(2) is a Minkowski space with signature (1,3), i\mathbb RI\oplus su(2) is a Minkowski space with signature (3,1), SU(2) is the double cover of SO(3), sl(2,\mathbb C) is the...
Back
Top