What is the relationship between mass and acceleration based on given data?

  • Thread starter Thread starter novawinters
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kinematics Physics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on analyzing the relationship between mass and acceleration based on provided data. The individual graphed acceleration against mass but found no clear trend, noting that higher mass did not consistently correlate with higher acceleration. They questioned the data collection method and the nature of the objects involved, suggesting gravity may be the primary force at play. Despite some variations, the consensus is that there is insufficient information to establish a definitive relationship between mass and acceleration. Overall, the findings indicate that no significant correlation exists based on the given values.
novawinters
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I need to find the relation between mass and acceleration.I was given the values above in a table, save for acceleration.
The mass of the object was given as well, so that I could plot acceleration v. mass

This is part of my chart.
Object Mass (g) ti (s) Vi (m/s [d]) tf (s) Vf (m/s [d]) A (m/s2)
1 1696 0.65 0.244 1.00 3.526 9.37
2 573 0.45 0.399 0.80 3.709 9.45
3 151.95 0.45 0.575 0.80 3.674 8.85

Homework Equations


a = Vf-Vi/Tf - Ti

The Attempt at a Solution


I successfully graphed my 8 values, but I couldn't find a trend. When I adjusted the scale, it sort of looked like a sinusoidal function.

+ my original hypothesis that more mass is equal to increased acceleration was wrong, because some high mass values didn't have high acceleration values
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Like this?
acceleration.jpg


What are the "[d]" symbols?
Does it say what kind of objects are involved, what force accelerated them? Anything more?

As it stands, I would have to say there is no trend. No relationship can be found.
 
Looks like gravity accelerated them.

What are the other 5 mass values, along with the acceleration value for each?

Maybe the accelerations are nearly equal, with some random or systematic variation.

For the three values listed, there is not much correlation between mass and acceleration.

One of the masses is more than 10 times one of the others, yet it's acceleration in only a bout 5% higher than that of the smaller mass.
 
Here's my updated work:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/50168628/accelerationoffallingobject

I would appreciate if you could tell me whether I'm correct or not. Thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I agree; no trend.
If you must have one, drop the one low acceleration point as unreasonable and the rest will probably have a line of best fit with a slight upward slope, so slightly more acceleration as the mass increases.
 
There is not enough information to draw any conclusions. "I was given the values above in a table" is not inspiring... How was this data collected? What was the setup of the experiment?
 
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Back
Top