What is the reputable function for time dilation in special relativity?

Teriss
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I need some help to answer a question as my physics background, while self taught, still has some holes both from following only specifics and gaps since studying it.

The question is below.


"is there a reputable function for the effect of time dilation in special relativity or is just like a guessing thing. I always assumed that because of the way I think light works (again I'm a game theorist so I could be wrong) that it would have to approach an asymptote at some point. Just kind of curious about it after reading the Forever War by Joe Halderman. "

Something about it smacks me as a relative mash-up just to mess with me.

I'm just trying to answer this without getting it wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Time dilation in SR has definite equations for its application. They are important equations for the operation of GPS satellites.
 


you appear to be referring to the Lorentz equation:
\Delta t'= \frac{\Delta t}{\sqrt{1- \frac{v^2}{c^2}}}

That's pretty definite (and "reputable"). It's also normally one of the first things you learn about relativity. If that's not what you mean, what do you mean?
 
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
Thread 'Relativity of simultaneity in actuality'
I’m attaching two figures from the book, Basic concepts in relativity and QT, by Resnick and Halliday. They are describing the relativity of simultaneity from a theoretical pov, which I understand. Basically, the lightning strikes at AA’ and BB’ can be deemed simultaneous either in frame S, in which case they will not be simultaneous in frame S’, and vice versa. Only in one of the frames are the two events simultaneous, but not in both, and this claim of simultaneity can be done by either of...
Back
Top