What is the residue of cot(z) at z=0?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dixanadu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Residue
AI Thread Summary
To find the residue of cot(z) at z=0, the limit approach is used, recognizing that z=0 is a simple pole. The residue is calculated using the formula Residue = lim_{z → 0} (z - 0) cot(z), which simplifies to z cot(z). The initial attempt incorrectly evaluates the limit as 0, leading to confusion since the actual residue is 1. The discussion highlights the need to apply L'Hôpital's rule to resolve the limit correctly, emphasizing the importance of understanding the underlying calculus principles. The conversation concludes with a reminder that not all problems will have straightforward solutions provided in textbooks.
Dixanadu
Messages
250
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


So guys..the title says it! I need to find the residue of cot(z) at z=0.


Homework Equations


For this situation, since the pole order is 1

Residue=\lim_{z \to z_{0}}(z-z_{0})f(z)


The Attempt at a Solution


So here's what I am doing in steps:

First, the singularity is at z=0. So z_{0}=0.

Then I multiply both sides by (z-z_{0})=z...to get (z-z_{0})f(z)=zcot(z)

Now taking the limit of this is as z = 0 is 0 \times \frac{cos(0)}{sin(0)}=0...but this is wrong, the residue is 1...

I know its something stupid that I am doing but what is it? even if i expand sin and cos I still end up with 0...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Study this argument carefully and see if that doesn't remind you of some elementary calculus:

Dixanadu said:
0 \times \frac{cos(0)}{sin(0)}=0
 
Yea I guess you're supposed to use L'Hopital's rule to find the behaviour of the function towards a limit...textbook didnt really say that
 
Dixanadu said:
textbook didnt really say that

For most problems you encounter, there won't be a textbook to tell you anything at all. Take a minute to understand the trick.
 
thanks for the hint tho bro!
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top