What is the significance of charge neutralization in physics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter AZcristian623
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge Physics
Click For Summary
Charge is an intrinsic property of matter, not made of any physical substance, and is crucial for the stability of atoms. Protons carry a positive charge due to their quark composition, while electrons possess a negative charge inherently. Charge neutralization is often necessary for stability, as like charges repel each other, leading to the need for opposite charges to balance forces. The universe exhibits a roughly equal number of protons and electrons, though the reason for this balance remains unclear, paralleling the mystery of matter versus antimatter. Overall, charge neutralization plays a significant role in maintaining stability in atomic structures and the broader universe.
AZcristian623
Messages
4
Reaction score
1
What is this charge physically made out of? Why most of the time does a charge physically need to have an opposite charge neutralizing it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Charge isn't really made out of anything so to speak, its just an intrinsic property of matter. It can be described, but that's really about it. Protons have a positive (1+) charge because they are made up of two quarks with +2/3 charge and another with -1/3 charge. Electrons just have a negative charge, because well that is just the way they are. Also you don't necessarily need to have opposite charges neutralising each other. In things like atoms however it is more "stable" to have a neutral charge overall.
 


Observationally, I would just say that certain particles exhibit an electrostatic repulsion with the same type of particles, so that brings in the concept of charge. Then we also find that these particles can exhibit electrostatic repulsion to certain different types of particles, and that brings in the concept of sign of charge. The only other connection between protons and electrons is simply that they are both extremely common. Then the reason we tend to find them together, and in cancelling numbers, is that if we did not, there would be huge electrostatic forces that would act to change the situation until they did cancel.

Or maybe you are asking why is there roughly the same number of protons and electrons in the universe as a whole, and that's actually a pretty good question-- I have no idea, and maybe that is as difficult a question to answer as why is there more matter than antimatter. Note that if there were equal amounts of matter and antimatter (so annihilation didn't prevent that), then the electrons would just draw in equal numbers of positrons and you wouldn't need a similar number of protons to achieve charge neutrality.
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
280
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
947
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K