What is the uncertainty in this result?

  • Thread starter Thread starter looi76
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Uncertainty
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the uncertainty in the density of a rectangular block based on its mass and dimensions. Initial calculations suggest a density of 2.50 g/cm³ with an uncertainty of ±0.0125 g/cm³. However, it is clarified that percentage uncertainties for products and quotients should be added, not divided. The corrected percentage uncertainty for density is 2.1%, leading to a revised density of 2.50 g/cm³ ± 0.053 g/cm³. The importance of verifying results through extreme values of mass and volume is also emphasized.
looi76
Messages
80
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The density of the material of a rectangular block is determined by measuring the mass and linear dimensions of the block. The table shows the results obtained, together with their uncertainties.

Mass = (25.0 \pm 0.1)g
Lenght = (5.00 \pm 0.01)cm
Breath = (2.00 \pm 0.01)cm
Height = (1.00 \pm 0.01)cm

The density is calculated to be 2.50gcm^-3
What is the uncertainty in this result?

Homework Equations


Density = Mass / Volume
Percentage Uncertainty = Acutal Uncertainty / True Value * 100

The Attempt at a Solution



Mass % Uncertainty = \frac{0.1}{25.0} \times 100 = 0.4\%
Lenght % Uncertainty = \frac{0.01}{5.00} \times 100 = 0.2\%

Breath % Uncertainty = \frac{0.01}{2.00} \times 100 = 0.5\%

Height % Uncertainty = \frac{0.01}{1.00} \times 100 = 1\%

Density % Uncertainty = \frac{Mass \% Uncertainty}{Volume \% Uncertainty} = \frac{0.4}{0.2+0.5+1} = 0.5\%

Absoulte Value = \frac{0.5 \times 2.50}{100} = 0.0125gcm^-3

Density = 2.50 \pm 0.0125 gcm^-3

Is this right?

 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
looi76 said:
Mass % Uncertainty = \frac{0.1}{25.0} \times 100 = 0.4\%
Lenght % Uncertainty = \frac{0.01}{5.00} \times 100 = 0.2\%

Breath % Uncertainty = \frac{0.01}{2.00} \times 100 = 0.5\%

Height % Uncertainty = \frac{0.01}{1.00} \times 100 = 1\%


You are fine up to here.

Density % Uncertainty = \frac{Mass \% Uncertainty}{Volume \% Uncertainty} = \frac{0.4}{0.2+0.5+1} = 0.5\%


Sadly, perhaps, percentages of uncertainty don't divide in this way. In products and quotients, the percentages of uncertainty always add. (This can be shown from differentiation of products or quotients to solve for what are called "relative errors".)

The percentage of uncertainty in the density will be

0.4% (for the mass) + [0.2% + 0.5% + 1.0%] (for the volume product) = 2.1% .

So the density would be reported as

2.50 gm/(cm^3) +/- 2.1% or 2.50 +/- 0.053 gm/(cm^3) .

You can check this by looking at the density value obtained by using the highest mass in the uncertainty range divided by the smallest volume in its uncertainty range, and then the lowest mass divided by the largest volume. The agreement won't be exact because the "rules of thumb" for handling percentages of uncertainty are only approximate (the agreement is ideal only for infinitesimal changes).
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top