What is the unknown charge if the net electrostatic force on particle 1 is zero?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the unknown charge q that results in a net electrostatic force of zero on particle 1 in a square configuration of charged particles. The known charges are q1 and q4, both equal to 1.06 × 10-15 C, while q2 and q3 are the unknown charges. The net force acting on particle 1 from particle 4 is calculated to be 8.45E-18 N, and the X component of the force from particle 2 is negative 6.00E-18 N. An initial calculation for q yielded 7.49E-16 C, but this was incorrect due to using the wrong distance in the formula. The correct approach involves ensuring the proper distance is used to achieve the correct charge value for q.
Monkey_Man08
Messages
3
Reaction score
1
1. The problem statement: In the figure four particles form a square with edge length a = 2.44 × 10-2 m. The charges are q1 = q4 = 1.06 × 10-15 C and q2 = q3 = q. What is q if the net electrostatic force on particle 1 is zero?
All variables and given/known data: The given variable are in the statement, but I have calculated and checked some other important variables.
  • Net force acting on particle 1 by particle 4 is 8.45E-18 N.
  • The X component of the force acting on particle 1 by particle 2 is negative 6.00E-18 N.
  • Distance from particle 1 to particle 4 is 0.034507 m.

Homework Equations

: Coulomb Force:
11bfec934e963740d4bed02c2062a4e7.png
, where k = 8.99E9[/B]

The Attempt at a Solution


Since I'm using the above equation to solve for q2, I used algebra to set it up as q2 = (F)(r2) / (k)(q1). Once I plugged the numbers I have (6.00E-18)(1.19E-3) / (8.99E9)(1.06E-15). Once I plug all that in the calculator, I'm left with 7.49E-16 C. But supposedly that is the wrong answer. I've checked my math enough to know all the information above "The attempt at a solution" portion is correct, so the problem must lie within this final step... I think.
 

Attachments

  • Q1.jpg
    Q1.jpg
    3.6 KB · Views: 556
Physics news on Phys.org
Note that when inputting my final answer I put in negative 7.49E-16 C, because in order for particle 2 and 3 to counteract the forces of particle 4, they must have a negative charge.
 
I was using the wrong distance for r in my final calculation. All is solved.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top