What Is the Value of Constant k in This Probability Distribution Function?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the value of the constant k in the probability distribution function for an electrical product's failure over time. The function is defined for 0 < t < tmax, with tmax set at 10 years. One participant initially attempts to solve the integral of the function from 0 to 10 years, equating it to 1 to find k, but realizes a mistake in their calculations regarding the exponential term. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly evaluating integrals and understanding the implications of the parameters involved. Ultimately, the correct approach to finding k is confirmed through clarification of the integral's evaluation.
SMC
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The technical specification of a particular electrical product states that the probability of its failure with time is given by the function:

f(t) = 1 - ke^(-t/t0) if 0 < t < tmax
f(t) = 0 if t > tmax

where t is the time of service in years, and the constant t0 = 100 years defines the characteristic deterioration time. If the maximal life span of the product tmax is 10 years,
find the value of constant k , explaining its meaning,

Homework Equations


i thought i was supposed to find the integral of 1 - ke^(-t/t0) with respect to t between 0 and 10 years and put the answer equal to 1. then find k from that. [/B]

The Attempt at a Solution



now this is a past exam paper question so i actually have the partial solution to the question which says that:

k = -9/(t0(e^(-10/t0) - 1))

but what i get is k = -9/(t0e^(-10/t0))

I'm pretty sure I'm doing the integral correctly so there must be some step I'm missing that accounts for that extra -1 in the denominator.

[/B]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Did the past exam question have exactly the same problem statement?
The second solution looks odd. It gives wrong results for very large t0, for example. How did you get it?

Why do both solutions depend on t? They should not do that. Is that tmax?
 
yeah sorry that t should be tmax = 10... I've edited it
 
i just did the integral 0 and 10 of the function given and put it equal to 1 because the probability of it failing within a 10 year period is 100%. once I've done the integral I get:

10 - k*e^(-10/t0)*(-t0) = 1 (int. between 0 and 10 of 1 is 10 and int. between 0 and 10 of k*e^(-t/t0) is k*e^(-10/t0)*(-t0) )

then i find k from that. is this wrong?
 
OMG I just realized what I did! I'm really sorry! never mind! please ignore!
 
i considered e^0 = 0 I've made this mistake quite a few times especially in integrlas! o0)
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top