What Is the x Component of the Electric Field at a Point on the x-Axis?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the x component of the electric field at a point on the x-axis due to a charged rod with a non-uniform linear charge density. Participants clarify that the charge density λ varies along the rod and that the electric field must be determined by integrating contributions from infinitesimal charge elements. The correct approach involves using Coulomb's law to find the electric field from a small section of the rod and integrating from -L/2 to L/2. There is confusion about the distance r, which participants confirm should be calculated based on the rod's length and the distance from the point of interest. Ultimately, the integration method is emphasized as necessary for solving the problem accurately.
Broem
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A charged rod of length L = 1.00 m lies centered on the x-axis as shown. The rod has a linear charge density which varies according to λ = ax where a = −90.0 μC/m.
What is the x component of the electric field at a point on the x-axis a distance of D = 2.00 m from the end of the rod?

Homework Equations


E=kQ/r^2
charge density = Q/A

The Attempt at a Solution


I really do not understand...Where do I get the r from? Since its not uniformly distributed how can there be any field outside?
Would my r = (D-(half of L))?
I'm assuming lambda is just regular charge density at a location of x?
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Broem! :smile:
Broem said:
Would my r = (D-(half of L))?
I'm assuming lambda is just regular charge density at a location of x?

Yes. :smile:

(and of course it's a linear charge density, ie coulombs per metre, not per metre3 :wink:)
Since its not uniformly distributed how can there be any field outside?

Not following you. :confused:
 
Thanks for the quick response!
Ok so here's where I am:

I now know that lambda = Q/L so Q = L * (lambda)

So I'm left with
9e9(-9e-6)/(2-.5)^2

This however is not the correct answer...Where can I go from here?
 
oh, no, you'll have to integrate

use coulomb's law to find the electric field from a tiny section [x,x+dx] (whose charge will be λdx, and which you can assume is concentrated entirely at x), and integrate from -L/2 to L/2 :wink:
 
I got it!
Thank you so much for your help!
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top