What is wrong with my reasoning here?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mpatryluk
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a misunderstanding regarding squaring and square roots in mathematics. When squaring a negative number, the result is positive, but taking the square root of a positive number yields both a positive and a negative solution (x = ±5). The squaring function is not one-to-one, meaning it does not have a unique inverse, which is why the square root of x² is the absolute value of x (|x|). It's important to clarify the context when dealing with physical problems, as negative solutions may not have practical significance. Understanding these concepts helps clarify the reasoning behind the operations involving squares and square roots.
mpatryluk
Messages
46
Reaction score
0
I've just noticed that i have a fundamental lack of understanding in a specific aspect of math, and I can't find where my reasoning is flawed.

x = -5
x^2 = (-5)^2
x^2 = 25
x = 5

So in squaring the negative I remove it, and then when I root the number back to original magnitude, the negative has disappeared. What am I missing?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
when you square root a number, it can either be negative or positive because a negative times a negative is a positive, as well as a positive times a positive
(-1)(-1)=1=(1)(1)
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
mpatryluk said:
I've just noticed that i have a fundamental lack of understanding in a specific aspect of math, and I can't find where my reasoning is flawed.

x = -5
x^2 = (-5)^2
x^2 = 25
x = 5

So in squaring the negative I remove it, and then when I root the number back to original magnitude, the negative has disappeared. What am I missing?

If you are presented with ## x^2 = 25 ## and asked to take the square root, your answer would be ## x = \pm 5 ##.

If you are in some situation where you know the answer has to be positive or negative you would have to offer some clarification in writing (or explanation if you are demonstrating to someone). Sometimes, for example, in physical problems, you know you have a positive magnitude, so the negative answer might not have any physical meaning.

-Dave K
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
dkotschessaa said:
If you are presented with ## x^2 = 25 ## and asked to take the square root, your answer would be ## x = \pm 5 ##.
Strictly speaking, no. If you were asked to solve the equation x^2= 25 then the answer would be x= \pm 5. But if you are asked to take the square root of 25, the answer is 5. The square root is a function and, by definition of "function", every function, f, has to have a unique value, f(x), for any given x.

The real difficulty is that the "squaring function", f(x)= x^2, is NOT "one-to-one" and so does not have a true "inverse". In particular, while it is always true that (\sqrt{x})^2= x, it is NOT always true that \sqrt{x^2}= x. What is true is that \sqrt{x^2}= |x|.

If you are in some situation where you know the answer has to be positive or negative you would have to offer some clarification in writing (or explanation if you are demonstrating to someone). Sometimes, for example, in physical problems, you know you have a positive magnitude, so the negative answer might not have any physical meaning.

-Dave K
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
What HallsOfIvy said is absolutely correct. In symbols, the three equations are the following:

$$ x = 5$$
$$ \Rightarrow x^2 = 5^2 = 25$$
$$\Leftrightarrow x = \pm 5$$

The squaring operation in the second equation is not one-to-one, and so not reversible, which is the reason for the "implies" one-way arrow. Another way to think of this is that the solution set of the first equation {5} is different from the solution set of the second equation, which is {5, -5}. The solution sets of the second and third equations are exactly the same, which is indication by the double-ended arrow.

The operations that are one-to-one, and hence reversible, are the arithmetic operations (add, subtract, multiply, divide - restricted to nonzero divisors), exponentiating (taking e to some power), taking the log, and so on.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...

Similar threads

Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
28
Views
5K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
55
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Back
Top