What Light Source Was Used in the Michelson-Morley Experiment?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ZLBilley
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Experiment
Click For Summary
The Michelson-Morley experiment utilized a carbide bicycle lamp as its primary light source, which was suitable for producing a narrow beam. While coherent light sources like lasers were not available at the time, the experiment did not require perfect coherence; a limited range of frequencies was sufficient. The use of a gas discharge tube emitting a line spectrum was also mentioned as a potential alternative for monochromatic light. Concerns about interference effects from a broader frequency range, such as those from an oil lamp, were acknowledged but deemed not problematic in this context. Overall, the choice of light source played a crucial role in the experiment's design and outcomes.
ZLBilley
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Since this experiment was done long before lasers were invented, what did they use as a coherent light source? All the explanations of the experiment I can seem to find skip this detail and I am curious.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
They didn't need a coherent light source. A narrow beam sufficed.
 
I suppose the important bit wouldn't be the coherent bit, but having a light source with a limited range of frequencies so that the change in intensity due to the change in interference in one wavelength wasn't canceled out by an opposite change in intensity from other wavelengths interfering differently. A light source like an oil lamp would have too large a range of frequencies for the interference effects to not wash each other out wouldn't it?
 
I don't know what they used as a light source, but whatever they used, the problem you raised didn't seem to be an issue.
 
For monchromatic light something like a gas discharge tube that emits a line spectrum would do the job.
 
They used a carbide bicycle lamp for the experiments. They sometimes used a sodium-vapor lamp to help set up.
 
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
10K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K