- #36
sophiecentaur
Science Advisor
Gold Member
- 29,600
- 7,179
"Cycloid" is correct, I think. There is a whole family of cycloids - with and without loops. I looked it up yesterday, aamof.
The above reads quite convincingly and I think the idea of treating all motion as motion makes sense. I've been rather hoping for a null hypothesis argument and your idea could potentially do that. I think a sufficient argument has to clear up the significance of the rigidity of the book.
The above reads quite convincingly and I think the idea of treating all motion as motion makes sense. I've been rather hoping for a null hypothesis argument and your idea could potentially do that. I think a sufficient argument has to clear up the significance of the rigidity of the book.