What Makes Mandlebrot and Julia Sets Fascinating in Fractal Mathematics?

AI Thread Summary
Fractal mathematics, particularly Mandlebrot and Julia sets, captivates enthusiasts due to their intricate patterns generated by simple algorithms. Users can start exploring fractals by downloading software like Winfract or Fractint, which are compatible with various Windows versions. The discussion highlights the significant advancements in computing power, noting that programs that once took hours to run now complete in seconds. Julia sets are defined by specific complex number sequences, while the Mandlebrot set serves as an index for these Julia sets based on convergence criteria. The fascination with fractals lies in their ability to produce complex visuals from straightforward mathematical principles.
Hyperreality
Messages
201
Reaction score
0
I am sure the same goes for you lot, I am fascinated by the complex patterns of fractals and recently found out it is generated by extremely simple algorithms (which takes weeks to run).

What do I actually need run some algorithms that generates fractals?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Last edited by a moderator:
"Which takes weeks to run"? What vintage computer are you running these things on?

Many years ago, I wrote a program to draw Mandlebrot's set (and the Julia sets). I would start it running and go to class. When I got back about an hour later, it would be almost finished! Now exactly the same program take a few seconds.

Julia sets, Jc, are those starting points (thought of as complex numbers: (x,y)= x+ iy= z), z0, for which the sequence zn+1= zn2+ c converges.
The Mandlebrot set, sort of an "index" to Julia sets, are those c values for which zn+1= zn2+ c, with z0= 0, converges.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top