B What Math do I need to learn best for Classical and Quantum Physics?

AI Thread Summary
For a 14-year-old interested in physics, especially astrophysics, learning calculus and linear algebra is essential as they form the foundation for advanced topics. However, self-study without feedback can lead to misconceptions that are hard to correct, and boredom from mastering material too early can stifle curiosity. It's recommended to deepen understanding of school subjects like math, physics, and chemistry while regularly checking knowledge through additional resources. Exploring complex numbers and probability theory can also be beneficial, along with an introduction to Special Relativity. Ultimately, mastering math skills will allow for a greater focus on the more intriguing aspects of physics.
Godzilla-3301
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I am a 14 year old who is very interested in Physics, especially astrophysics, but I don’t know exactly which math I should study in order to learn more in depth of the field. What is the best thing to learn?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Physics is written in mathematics, a rather specific mathematical dialect to be exact. It is usually taught parallel to the standard courses in physics.

You could begin to learn calculus or linear algebra because these two are the fundamentals of basically everything else.

BUT ...

... there are some serious implications which must be considered:
  • If you learn it wrong because you are alone and have no feedback from a teacher, it is very difficult to "unlearn" misconceptions.
  • If you learn it right, e.g. because you regularly checked your knowledge here on PF, then you will probably get bored if it is time to learn it at a university. And being bored is a serious danger as it kills curiosity, the most important attitude of all.
  • You could get frustrated because things are more difficult than you thought. And frustration is a sad thing. People tend to give up if being frustrated.
  • Where do you learn the school stuff, which is in between your current knowledge and the beginning of a calculus textbook?
So unless you're a genius, there are some severe obstacles to be considered. The best recommendation is very likely: Learn as much as you can along with your regular classes at school, especially in math, physics, and chemistry, maybe biology, too, and try to understand those subjects on a deeper level of understanding. Always ask why, read additional texts, e.g. Wikipedia pages, and do your homework.

If you want to know where you are at, you can test your knowledge with the books on https://openstax.org/subjects or have a look at the high school problems in https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/solution-manuals-for-the-math-challenges.977057/. Those problems (all of them) give you an example of where you want to go. Keep in mind that you are not supposed to understand them, yet, so do not get frustrated. They are challenges, and even physicists or mathematicians cannot solve all of them from the spot.

Summary: Be good at school!
 
  • Like
Likes hutchphd and jedishrfu
fresh_42 said:
Physics is written in mathematics, a rather specific mathematical dialect to be exact. It is usually taught parallel to the standard courses in physics.

You could begin to learn calculus or linear algebra because these two are the fundamentals of basically everything else.

BUT ...

... there are some serious implications which must be considered:
  • If you learn it wrong because you are alone and have no feedback from a teacher, it is very difficult to "unlearn" misconceptions.
  • If you learn it right, e.g. because you regularly checked your knowledge here on PF, then you will probably get bored if it is time to learn it at a university. And being bored is a serious danger as it kills curiosity, the most important attitude of all.
  • You could get frustrated because things are more difficult than you thought. And frustration is a sad thing. People tend to give up if being frustrated.
  • Where do you learn the school stuff, which is in between your current knowledge and the beginning of a calculus textbook?
So unless you're a genius, there are some severe obstacles to be considered. The best recommendation is very likely: Learn as much as you can along with your regular classes at school, especially in math, physics, and chemistry, maybe biology, too, and try to understand those subjects on a deeper level of understanding. Always ask why, read additional texts, e.g. Wikipedia pages, and do your homework.

If you want to know where you are at, you can test your knowledge with the books on https://openstax.org/subjects or have a look at the high school problems in https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/solution-manuals-for-the-math-challenges.977057/. Those problems (all of them) give you an example of where you want to go. Keep in mind that you are not supposed to understand them, yet, so do not get frustrated. They are challenges, and even physicists or mathematicians cannot solve all of them from the spot.

Summary: Be good at school!
Thanks, I will use this advice to heart.
 
From what I saw what they learn in QM, a lot of functional analysis is involved. I would say 14 is far too young to get into analysis.
 
If you are keen, you could take a look at complex numbers. They're important for QM.

Also, probability theory might be interesting.

And, there is nothing to stop you talking a look at Special Relativity.
 
fresh_42 said:
  • If you learn it right, e.g. because you regularly checked your knowledge here on PF, then you will probably get bored if it is time to learn it at a university. And being bored is a serious danger as it kills curiosity, the most important attitude of all.
Speaking for experience:

I self taught the first semester of university's 1st semester math curriculum during my gap year and basically slept through the course. I didn't even purchase the book. Result: Easy A on exam. A 4 hour exam took 20 minutes to complete. While this is bragging, my message is that it really pays off as I could focus on my other (more difficult) courses. If OP nails down his maths skills, he could focus on the actually interesting things about physics.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
430
Replies
71
Views
919
Replies
39
Views
711
Replies
25
Views
4K
Replies
18
Views
729
Back
Top