What Models Explain the Expansion of the Big Bang?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on acceptable models explaining the expansion of the Big Bang and the visible universe. Four primary models are proposed: an expanding infinity, local expansion with non-expansion areas, local expansion in higher dimensions, and finite expansion without external space. The LambdaCDM model is referenced, with options 1 and 4 representing infinite and finite spatial volumes, respectively. The conversation emphasizes that these models reflect observational evidence rather than definitive choices, and highlights the complexity of understanding concepts like infinity and finiteness. Overall, the models aim to clarify the nature of the universe's expansion as observed today.
Pjpic
Messages
235
Reaction score
1
What are the acceptable models to eplain how the big bang is expanding the space of our visible universe? Are these the choices? 1) An expanding infinity 2) local expansion with an area of non-expansion beyond our range of observation 3) local expansion with an an area of non expansion in some higher dimension 4) finite expansion without anything outside the area of expansion. Are the other choices?
 
Space news on Phys.org
I don't know any other possibilities, if I understand the alternatives you present. I personally like 1) and 4). They seem to be the two possibilities you have in the standard cosmological model (LambdaCDM)

Pjpic said:
What are the acceptable models to explain how the big bang is expanding the space of our visible universe? Are these the choices?

1) An expanding infinity
...
4) finite expansion without anything outside the area of expansion
...

Your option 1) would be the LCDM model with Omega=1. Which means spatially flat, and assuming no exotic complications, infinite spatial volume.
Your option 4) would be the LCDM with Omega > 1. A finite spatial volume like the 3D analog of the 2D surface of a balloon with noting inside or outside the 2D surface. An expanding finite volume without anything else---no other space of any dimensionality.

That doesn't cover before the big bang, where there might be a contracting region. but that is not what you were asking about. You were focusing on the expanding space directly connected with what we can see. I think your four possibilities cover all the pictures people have of that. Hope someone will correct me if I am forgetting about something.
 
Last edited:
They are not choices, merely nudges is the direction observational evidence steers the 'ship' of science. Theory is the term scientists prefer to predict the future course of the 'ship'.
 
I wonder if this is so difficult to comphrehend due to how infinite and finite are defined. Because, to a lay person; it doesn't seem like an "actual infinity" can be increased or that something finite would not have a boundry.
 
what is the current status of the field for quantum cosmology, are there any observations that support any theory of quantum cosmology? is it just cosmology during the Planck era or does it extend past the Planck era. what are the leading candidates into research into quantum cosmology and which physics departments research it? how much respect does loop quantum cosmology has compared to string cosmology with actual cosmologists?
Back
Top